Title : Two More MMR Vaccine Whistleblowers: They’re Suing
link : Two More MMR Vaccine Whistleblowers: They’re Suing
Two More MMR Vaccine Whistleblowers: They’re Suing
Where there is smoke and fire - no more fires. You pro-vaccine soccer moms :. Pay attentionby Jon Rappoport
"The bigger the lie, the greater the truth is being hidden. The truth is what people are afraid to accept. "(the Metro Jon Rappoport )
the film censored Vaxxed ( trailer ), he has escaped from the clutches of the "protectors of all truth." It has been showing to packed houses across the country. It is related to the specific crime of scientific fraud of the CDC.

An informer, William Thompson, confesses that he and his colleagues of the lied and cheated CDC and omits vital data, in order to administer the MMR vaccine a free pass and claim that it had no relationship with autism - when I was a connection.
That is the purpose and meaning and focus of this amazing film.
But there is more. There are other whistleblowers who shines a light on the (mumps, measles, rubella) vaccine MMR. Specifically, the mumps component of the vaccine and ineffective.
Their names are Stephen A. Krahling and Joan A. Wlochowski. They are former Merck virologists. They are initiated.
Han devastating charges leveled against the company, which manufactures the MMR vaccine and sells it to the federal government.
In 2010, the complainants filed a lawsuit against Merck. Demand continues in court ( " UNITED STATES et al v MERCK & CO ..." Case No. 2: 10-cv-04374-CDJ)
The . Huffington post reports on the charges in the suit ( " Merck has some explaining to do about their claims MMR vaccine ", 09/24/2014, update: 11/27/2014):
"... the ancient scientists from Merck [claim] Merck 'fraudulently misleading the government and ignored, hidden, and adulterated relevant information regarding the efficacy of the mumps vaccine in violation of the FCA [False Claims Act].'""according to the complainants court documents, misconduct Merck reaching:
is not released its mumps vaccine was not as effective as represented Merck
(ii) used techniques inadequate testing
(iii) the methodology manipulated test
(iv) discontinued results of the unwanted evidence
(v) test data counterfeit
(vi) failed to adequately investigate and report the decreased effectiveness of the vaccine against mumps,
(vii) falsely verified that each batch of mumps vaccine would be as effective as identified in the labeling,
(viii) falsely certified the accuracy of the applications submitted to the FDA,
(ix) compliance falsely certified with the terms of the CDC buys [of the MMR vaccine] contract
(x) involved in fraud and concealment described herein in order to monopolize illegally in the US market for mumps vaccine
(xi) mislabelled with errors brand, and falsely certified its mumps vaccine, and
(xii) participating in other events described in this document to hide the decreased effectiveness of the vaccine against the government was buying. ''
"These fraudulent activities, according to the complainants, they were designed to produce test results that meet the FDA requirements that the mumps vaccine was 95 percent effective.charges of complainants include specific details about how he deceived Merck, in order to produce the false conclusion that the mumps component of the MMR vaccine was 95% effective.
"To the delight of the complainants, the judge dismissed the objections of Merck for the case to proceed, finding the complainants had plausible reasons for all claims filed against Merck."
For example, Merck placed rabbit antibodies in blood samples -. Pretending they were human antibodies signaling a high level of immune response to the vaccine
It should be noted that this charge of major fraud covers years during which Dr. Julie Gerberding was the president of Merck vaccines.
Why is this important? Because Gerberding, before landing his good paying job at Merck, was the head of the Centers for Disease Control.
And while she was the head of the CDC, in 2004, William Thompson, the complainant CDC revealed in Vaxxed warned Gerberding he had "sensitive" data on the vaccine MMR , and this data is a problem for the CDC.
Thompson was obviously speaking vaccine link to autism. Gerberding Thompson ignored.
You could say that folded down. After leaving the CDC, he became president of Merck vaccines, the company that manufactures the vacccine MMR, has a monopoly on it, and sells it to the CDC
-. So when scientists, experts, government officials, and other "experts" consider how at Harvard a recent outbreak of mumps could have affected students vaccinated previously , which is faking.
Even within the (false) conventional view of how vaccines work and what they do, the mumps component of the MMR is a failure. It has been an open secret for a long time.
And now two complainants Merck are reducing the rise in court.
The United States Department of Justice wants nothing to do with this case. Neither does the US Congress. Within the federal government, there are blind eyes of the world.
If the government actively pursue the case, among other revelations, the public would witness Dr. Julie Gerberding, former director of the CDC, president of Merck vaccines, being raked over the coals on the stand of the witnesses.
that it should never happen.
If you think, as the case drags on, there is no effort to reduce the use of the vaccine, or investigate what is wrong. The judge in the case has set a timetable that places the start of proceedings in ...
Thanks for Reading Two More MMR Vaccine Whistleblowers: They’re Suing
Thank you for reading this Two More MMR Vaccine Whistleblowers: They’re Suing, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Two More MMR Vaccine Whistleblowers: They’re Suing Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2016/05/two-more-mmr-vaccine-whistleblowers.html
0 Response to "Two More MMR Vaccine Whistleblowers: They’re Suing"
Post a Comment