Title : Monsanto and the FDA: 2 crimes families working a trillion-dollar hustle
link : Monsanto and the FDA: 2 crimes families working a trillion-dollar hustle
Monsanto and the FDA: 2 crimes families working a trillion-dollar hustle
Perhaps you remember the Just-Label-It-ill-fated campaign. A number of activist groups asked the FDA for a federal regulation that would make mandatory labeling GMO foods.The petition more than one million signatures kneaded. However, the FDA decided only 394 of these were legitimate, since all the others were sent electronically in a single document.
exasperating? Of course. But that was nothing. Let's get to the core of the crime.
Imagine this. A murderer is brought to trial, and the jury, in a surprise verdict, finds him not guilty. Later, reporters interviewed the murderer. He says: "The jury freed me all depends on them They decide That is what justice is all about..."
then press moves along the jurors. , they say: Well, we had to take the word of the accused. He said he was innocent, so that's what was discarded.
This is an accurate description of the association of the FDA and Monsanto. by cutting through the verbiage surrounding the introduction of GM foods in America, it comes down to two key states. One of Monsanto and one of the FDA, the agency responsible for supervision, licensing and certification of new varieties of food as safe.
Quoted in the New York Times Magazine (October 25, 1998, "Playing God in the garden"), Philip Angell, director of corporate communications at Monsanto, delivered his famous words. "Monsanto should not have to grant the safety of biotech foods Our interest is in selling as much . of it as possible Assuring its safety is the job of the FDA Standard [FDA] "
from the Federal Register, Volume 57, No. 104." Policy foods derived from New Plant Varieties, "this is what the FDA had to say on this matter:". ultimately, is the food producer who is responsible for ensuring the safety "
the direct clash and irreconcilability of these two states is not an accident. It is not a sign of incompetence or sloppy work or an error or a miscommunication. Is a clear sign that the solution was in.
Pass the ball back and forth was the strategy cooling and arrogant through which Pandora's box pried opened and GM food was left in the supply food in the United States.
for this type of fraud titanic work, the media had to cooperate. Reporters had to be idiots a) and b) traitors.
With few exceptions, journalists and their editors allow the story to rest there as a "he said, he said" question. No journalist healthy first trial would have cut bait on that point, but who told the main reporters are healthy or principles?
Below the Monsanto FDA act wring the package, there was a conscious bid to give a free pass to GM crops. This has nothing to do with science or health or "feed the world." It was benefits. It also sought to establish a new monopoly of food.
Not only would the big agribusiness dominate food supply in the world, which would strengthen its dominance through patents on new types of seeds that were designed technologically.
is very similar to say: "An ear of corn is not a plant, a machine, which owns the rights to each of those yellow machines."
How he was able Monsanto gather as much influence?
there was one reason and one reason only. Put food supply in the world in fewer hands was, and is, an important issue in the globalist agenda. If it was not, the FDA-Monsanto scam would have been exposed in a matter of weeks or months.
Major newspapers and television networks have attacked the obvious scam, like packs of wild dogs and broken into pieces.
But once the scam had been given a free pass, the main tactic of corporate governance was to conduct a fait accompli, a series of events that was irreversible.
in this case , it was genetic drift. From the beginning, it was well known that plants release GMO genes blowing in the wind and spread from one plant to another, one culture to another, and from one field to another. There is no stopping him.
Along with sufficiently convincing farmers to lock themselves in contracts of GM seeds, Monsanto seed companies bought food in order to design the seeds ... and gene drift factor was the ace in the hole.
Sell sufficient transgenic seeds, enough GM crops vegetables and food crops in the world with genes from Monsanto to flood.
back in the 1990s, the prince of darkness, Michael Taylor, who has moved through the revolving door between the FDA and Monsanto several times, and now the food security czar FDA-Taylor said, with great conviction, that the GMO revolution was unstoppable; within a decade or two, a large percentage of the food grown on Earth would OMG.
Taylor and others knew. They knew of genetic drift, and also knew that ownership of the world's food, for a few companies, was the main focus of kings globalists that aims to feed the population through central planning and distribution.
"we feed these people, we have again the food of those people, send food there, do not send food here"
Control of food and water, and the world is held in hand [
Here is evidence that even in earlier days, Monsanto knew and pushed for the globalist agenda. Quoted by J. Flint, in his 1998 "agricultural giants move towards monopolism genetics," Robert Fraley, head of the agricultural division of Monsanto, said: "What you are seeing is not just a consolidation of [Monsanto-purchased] seed companies . it's really a consolidation of the entire food chain. "
And as for the power of propaganda in that period of time, I can think of a better state than did the January 25, 2001, by the outgoing Agriculture secretary Dan Glickman. As reported by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Glickman said
"What I saw generically on the side for biotechnology was the attitude that technology was good and it was almost immoral say it was not good, as it will solve the problems of the human race and feed the hungry and clothe the naked. and there was a lot of money invested in this, and if you are against it, you're Luddites, you're stupid. there was rhetoric like that even here in this department. you feel like you're almost an alien, disloyal, by trying to present a vision of an open mind on some of these problems arise. So jet more or less the rhetoric that everybody else around here spouted; it was written in my speeches. "Glickman reveals several things in these observations: it was spineless; people in the Department of Agriculture were buying like crazy for the cover story of Monsanto about feeding the world; and there had to be a significant degree of infiltration into its Agency.
The last point is key. This was not left to chance. You do not get a vocal majority of Agriculture Department personnel spouting propaganda Monsanto simply because the fairy tale about feeding the world sounds so good. No, not the people who work inside to promote "social cause" and make pariahs of dissidents.
It is necessary background and special training to accomplish that. It is not a walk in the park automatic. This is professional PSYOP and intelligence work.
I've done some research of several groups of the left and right, and I've seen some of the advantages of the action. They are good. They know how to harness the ideas and slogans and ideals. They know how to defame opponents and find the right words to sink. They know how to convert high-flying but vague words about "humanity" in moral imperatives.
This is nothing sleazy. To tune up bureaucrats and scientists, you have to have training in handling. You have to know what you are doing. You have to be able to build and maintain support, without giving his game away.
Indeed, governments are full of these professionals, who will take any number of causes and turn them into what falsely sounds like a good science, good governance, good morals, knowing all the while that on the other side, is the real prize. Control
These specialists PSYOP are hired to help general and throughout the agendas planet come true, as populations are subjected to sophisticated and pathological elites who care, for example, feeding the world both as a collector concerned by paralyzing and butterflies fixing on a panel in a glass case
Here is David Rockefeller, who writes in his memoirs 2003.
Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build political and economic structure of a global world more integrated society, if you want. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. "The globalists play to survive.
Owning the world's food is part of its plan of action of impact force, and Monsanto is the technocratic arm that plan.
Meanwhile, the controlled press treats the whole sordid story Monsanto with its policy of long tradition, "he said said." This policy dictates that more stories presenting both sides of a conflict without reaching conclusions.
applies in all areas, except when it does not. for example, for reasons too complex to go into here, the Washington Post decided to suspend its policy Watergate. Woodward and Bernstein case were assigned to investigate what was going on behind denials and confusion of the White House.
the same can be done with Monsanto, and it would be much easier. the lies and crimes and Cover-ups are everywhere. You could wear sunglasses and find them in the dark.
The New York Times and the Washington Post could sell millions more roles in the back of the story of Monsanto alone. It would be a bonanza for them. But no. They do not care. They prefer to continue to decline and the loss of readers. Rather they die.
Typically, a company will not commit suicide, especially when it looks exactly how to resurrect himself. But here we are dealing with an agenda that can not be disturbed. Globalism, and his partner agro-techno, Monsanto, are creating a planetary future. The mainstream media are an integral part of the op. Are selling the same.
Although their bottom lines erode, these newspapers and television networks have to stay on its current course. To pretend they are reporting the real news, they are giving the impression that Monsanto and the FDA are home free.
Again, we're not talking about reports careless or accidental omissions of fact or boggling incompetence or ignorance about science. We are talking about the conscious intent to deceive.
Yes, occasionally the controlled media will release a worrying piece of Monsanto. However, placement and frequency are everything. How often these stories run? Why run like lead or found on page 7? Reporters were assigned to keep hitting a basic story and reveal more and more crimes? Is the basic story gather steam over weeks and months?
These are the decisions that make or story. In the case of Monsanto and the FDA, decisions were taken long ago.
Part of the training of each new reporter, if you have no ideal at all, is marching in the office of his editor with the hair on fire demanding that an assignment is given to expose a crime. The editor, knowing the real agenda of your newspaper or TV network, tells the reporter:
"We've already covered that."
"It's old news."
"people are not interested in it."
"it's too complicated."
"The evidence to me is showing is thin."
"Never you'll get to the bottom of it "
" the people involved do not want to talk to you "
And if none of these lies work, the editor might say,".. If you keep pushing it, it would be bad for your career. you're going to lose access to other stories. you can think about how strange ... "
this is how the game works at ground level. But make no mistake about it, the hidden agenda is to protect op of an elite of exposure.
If NBC, for example, gave its golden boy, Brian Williams, the green light, would become an expert in Monsanto in three days. He had become a tiger. There were concerns a whole set of attitudes and send morally outraged Monsanto to Hell.
Do not misunderstand. Brian has not been waiting to go for the kill. It is a neutral entity. he end and aim at a target and it will go there.
But no one will point at Monsanto or the FDA.
All major news media in the press and all presenters TV elite PSYOP are really specialists. It's just that most of them do not know
An important outraged journalist who awoke and rose from the company me put it this way. When I was in the game, looked in the news as a large public bath. His only guiding principle was: Do not piss in your shoes. Standing closer to the potty. Peeing in his shoes covered a story that is considered out of bounds. If I upset in his shoes and went to the boss's office, he looks at you and see the telltale sign. He said, ". Hey, annoying in your shoes That's disgusting out of here're fired..."
Jon Rappoport
The author of an explosive collection, the matrix revealed, Jon he was a candidate for a seat in the US Congress in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative journalist for 30 years, writing articles about politics, medicine and health of the CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has given lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for their free email messages to www.nomorefakenews.com
Source: InfoWars.com
"Monsanto and the FDA: 2 crimes families working a trillion-dollar hustle", article source: riseearth.com
Thanks for Reading Monsanto and the FDA: 2 crimes families working a trillion-dollar hustle
Thank you for reading this Monsanto and the FDA: 2 crimes families working a trillion-dollar hustle, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Monsanto and the FDA: 2 crimes families working a trillion-dollar hustle Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2013/03/monsanto-and-fda-2-crimes-families.html
0 Response to "Monsanto and the FDA: 2 crimes families working a trillion-dollar hustle"
Post a Comment