Title : The Reasons We Fight The New World Order
link : The Reasons We Fight The New World Order
The Reasons We Fight The New World Order
Brandon SmithActivist Post
Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. - HG Wells The New World Order (1940)
Throughout our lives and in our culture, we are conditioned to gather around concepts false division . We are led to believe that Democrats and Republicans are separate and opposing parties, however, are actually two branches of the same mechanism of political control. They want us to believe that two nations like the United States and Russia are geopolitical enemies, when in fact, it is two puppet governments under the control of international financial themselves. Finally, we are told that international themselves bankers are somehow separated by borders and philosophies, when the reality is that all central banks respond to a singular authority: the Bank for International Settlements ( BIS).
We are amused with stories of constant conflict and division. However, the truth is that there is only one battle that matters, just a battle that has never mattered. The battle between those who try to control others and those who simply want to be alone
the "New World Order" is a concept created not in the mind of the "conspiracy theorists," but in the minds of those who try to control others. These are the self-proclaimed elite who claim to be grandly qualified to determine the fate of every man, woman and child at the expense of individual freedom and self-determination. Such elites are often quite open about their intentions and globalist ambitions, like the author H. G. Wells, a socialist member of the Fabian Society and friend to the internationalist establishment put forth his model for global governance in the aforementioned book. In this article, I would like to examine the nature of our war with the elite and why his theories on social engineering are illogical, inadequate and, in many cases, malicious and destructive.
the 'common good'
've always found it fascinating that while elitists and NWO champions constantly proclaim that morality is relative and that consciousness is not inherent, somehow they are the ones who have the proper definition of "greater good." If "good" is relative in all cases, then would not the "greater good" will also be entirely relative? This inconsistency in its reasoning does not seem to stop forcing the masses through propaganda or violence to accept their version of best judgment.
Like many psychologists and anthropologists (including Carl Jung and Steven Pinker) have demonstrated over decades of study, moral compass and conscience are not just environmental products; are innate ideals outside the scope of environmental influences. The greatest good feel intrinsically and intuitively by most people. Whether you hear this voice of conscience is up to the individual.
is no coincidence that NOM elites end up contradicting themselves affirming morality not make sense to say his personal morality to be pure. In order to gain power over others, they have to convince members of the public who are empty vessels without meaning or direction first. They must convince the masses to ignore their inner voice of conscience. Only then civil liberties sacrifice to acquire responses that really do not need elites who really do not have.
Collectivism
not pretend to know what would make the ideology of a perfect society, and certainly do not know the exact solutions needed to get there. What I do know, however, it is that no one else knows.
Every time someone takes a stage to announce that he alone has the answers to the world's problems, I can not help but be suspicious of their motives. Rarely, if ever, it is what I hear these people suggest that more freedom and individualism make a better future. Instead, their solution always involves less freedom, more control and more power in order to mold society to his vision.
The utopia that offers the power elite invariably requires a collectivist mentality that the individual you must give up their self-determination and independence so the group can survive and thrive. The problem is that no society, culture or group can exist without the efforts and contributions of individuals. Therefore, freedom and prosperity of the individual is more important than safety or even the existence of the group.
The elites understand this fact, so do book a bit of individuality ( . of his own small circle)
No matter the disguise presents - either socialism, communism, fascism or some amalgam of everyone - the goal is always the same: collectivism and slavery of masses and unbridled greed of the oligarchs.
the philosophy of force
If your idea of a better society is a good and rational one should not be necessary use force in order to get people to accept it. Only inherently destructive ideas require the use of force to scare the public into compliance. The New World Order is an idea that is based entirely on force.
Globalization has constantly sold to us as part of the natural progression of humanity, however, this "natural progression" is always advanced through the use of lies, manipulation, fear and violence. The concept of the New World Order is one of complete centralization; centralization that can not be achieved without the use of terror, which would support the creation of an authority malicious global power unless he was terrified to do?
The only use of morally acceptable force is the use of force to defend against attacks. As the NWO relentlessly pressed forward his attack on our liberties, we, the defenders are labeled as "violent extremists" if we refuse to go along quietly. the dependence of the NOM in force to promote their values makes it an inherently flawed methodology stems from ignorance and psychopathy, instead of wisdom and truth.
Dishonesty as policy
as with the use of violence, the use of lies to succeed automatically poisons everything good that may have been taken through the efforts of one. Elites often ignore this logic to convince the other that there is such a thing as a "noble lie" (both Saul Alinsky and Leo Strauss , the guardians of the false left / right paradigm, promoted the use of "noble lies") and that the masses need to be deceived so they can be deceived to do what is best for them and for the world. This is, of course, a sociopath self-aggrandizing game
Lies are rarely, if ever, exploited by people who want to make the lives of other men.; lies are used by people who want to make their own better life at the expense of others. Add to this the egotistical assertion that the elites are lying for "our own good" when in fact they are just to raise their power, and what you get is a stereotypically abusive relationship on a global scale.
Methodologies have legitimate benefits to humanity deliberately seek the truth and not have to hide behind a veil of disinformation and disorientation. If a methodology requires secrecy, occultism and deceit in order to settle in a culture, then it is most likely one in which culture, not a positive or negative influence.
hands a few
Why humanity needs an elite at all? What purpose does this oligarchy really serve? It is really centralized power as efficient and convenient as it is painted to be? Or is it an obstacle to humanity and an obstacle in our quest to better ourselves? NWO champions argue that global governance is inevitable and that sovereignty in any form is the cause of all our ills. However, I think when I look back on the finer points of history (the points that do not teach in college textbooks), the real cause of most of the world's ills is obviously the existence of elite groups .
the "efficiency" of centralization is useful only for those at the top of the pyramid, as it usually is in a vast maze of the impassable bureaucracy. Has to. Unstructured hyper-condensed authority can survive if citizens are not dependent on it is done. Centralization makes life difficult for everyone by eliminating our ability to provide our own essentials and make our own decisions. That is, the centralization eliminates all alternative system options until the only way left is easy to bow to the establishment.
've never seen a solid example of centralization of power resulting in a better society or the happiest people. I've also never met a select group of leaders enough and smart enough solidarity to oversee and micromanage the complex workings of the entire Earth. There is no use for the elite, so one has to wonder why we keep them around?
The Front View
Arguing about what should be done about the state of the world is a fruitless effort until you consider what to do about the state of his own life. While men are affected by bias, selfish desire and lack of awareness, will never be able to determine what is best for others. NOM opposite philosophy, the philosophy of the Freedom Movement, says that no one has the right to impose its own version of a perfect society in anyone else. As soon as someone does who has committed a serious attack on individual freedom. - An attack that must be answered
Our answer is simply that people who want to control others be withdrawn from checkpoints and that people who want to leave alone simply be left alone. Partnership and participation should always be voluntary; otherwise, society loses value. This is not anarchy in the sense that a result is eliminated. On the contrary, the rights of people become paramount; and freedoms which have priority over the demands increasingly vaporous some abstract group.
The most common replica of this principle of valuing the individual over the collective fear is that "someone" you must implement and enforce a framework of law and accountability, otherwise society will "fall apart" in a vortex of madness and chaos . And maybe that's true, but self-government was never allowed to exist in the history of man without immediate interference by elite groups, so no one really knows for sure what would happen.
End with open government control, however, does not mean that we end up with the "law". The natural law, as with consciousness exists in our very biological and spiritual being, and does not require a central authority to define. Natural law supersedes the laws of men. In fact, the only laws made by man worth following are derived from natural law. The fundamental principle of natural law is that no one has the right to prevent or erode freedoms to others, provided natural laws are also respected. The second to anyone violates the innate rights of others, he has committed an offense against the natural law. His crimes against government authority are secondary, if not meaningless. When one understands the unquestionable existence and preeminence of natural law, he quickly discovers how governments are actually trivial.
The only reason for any government that exists is to safeguard individual freedom. Period. The original intent of the founders of America was to establish a nation that fostered this ideal. When the government or the oligarchy steps outside the limits of its mandate, is no longer the service that was originally designed for; and it must be dismantled. Unfortunately, it is a universal rule that tyranny uncompromising often must comply with the revolution without concessions.
When a new system that cannibalizes age emerges, enslaves our future, use aggression against us and mutilates our founding principles in the name of progress arbitrary, that the new system must be challenged and ultimately destroyed. The ideology of the New World Order represents one of the most heinous crimes against humanity of all time, posing in drag as our greatest hope. It is based primarily on everything that makes life unbearable for the common man life and all that our consciousness inherent fighting.
We would be much better served as a species if we were to turn our backs on the NOM in set and advance quickly in the opposite direction. Imagine what tomorrow would be like if there were, no statist drivers, no despots and no philosopher kings. Imagine a tomorrow where people natural-born rights of others are respected. Imagine a morning where irrational fears of people are not allowed to inhibit the freedoms of others. Imagine a future where interactions between citizens and government are rare or nonexistent. Imagine if we could live our days in peace, building our own destiny independently, in which our successes and failures are ours, rather than the property of the community. It may not be a perfect world, or a utopia, but I suspect it would be a lot better than we live today place
can contact Brandon Smith. brandon @ alt-market.com . Alt-Market, where this article first appeared , is an organization designed to help you find activists and preppers related in your local area, so that you can network and build communities of mutual aid and defense . Alt-Market.com Join today and learn what it means to step outside the system and build something better.
"The Reasons We Fight The New World Order", article source: riseearth.com
Thanks for Reading The Reasons We Fight The New World Order
Thank you for reading this The Reasons We Fight The New World Order, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article The Reasons We Fight The New World Order Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2014/07/the-reasons-we-fight-new-world-order.html
0 Response to "The Reasons We Fight The New World Order"
Post a Comment