Title : Everything Is A Lie: The Deliberate Intent To Deceive People Is At An All Time High
link : Everything Is A Lie: The Deliberate Intent To Deceive People Is At An All Time High
Everything Is A Lie: The Deliberate Intent To Deceive People Is At An All Time High
by Marco Torrespreventing disease
From pollution to politics, the era of deception and duplicity has reached new heights and kidnapped almost all forms of media in the world. In the last frontiers of truth, as the Internet, disinformation operations are in full swing to discredit and destroy any semblance of authentic information and made publicly available.
How many more lies will be people of all the world accepts as truth? Some say that a global awakening is taking place, but at what cost? It will take the destruction of most of the land and its resources so that people are enlightened?
The means of increasing communication and political reports are so crazy, cunning, and therefore beyond reality, it is as if everyone is trying above and the other with a sinister plot after the next. To demonstrate the blatant lies of national governments and the media, we will give three examples of the last year, including the scandal H1N1, body scanners at airports and the oil spill BP.
scandal H1N1
last year, the scandal of H1N1 peaked in the fall of 2009, when the world he joined on the Internet with the consensus and practical understanding of orchestratration of the World Health Organization to deceive the masses . From the radio, Internet, television, newspapers, magazines, outdoor posters, signage and promotions, you could not escape flu hype campaigns so diligently pursued by all malicious programs in the game they just wanted one thing - promote a vaccine against H1N1 flu dangerous . After hundreds of reports exposed the criminal activity by all levels of government, we the same people in power to do it all over again. According to preliminary reports, another round of campaigns pandemic vaccination are scheduled for the 2010/2011 season and are already underway. However, it seems that there is a recombination has changed the lab H1N1 virus created into a more deadly form and is not a joke, but may be another CDC laboratory experiment .
The CDC has recently published a Notice of Health on two outbreaks of H3N2 summer in Iowa. Other reports from Russia and India indicate that an epidemic may be on us if the virus is recombined and acquires new genetic steadily. Although a new strain may have accidentally evolved in eggs , redistribution of H1N1-H5N1 has been a concern legitimate for years. WHO suggested for the first time redistribution of H1N1-H5N1 in 2004 .
If this is really the case, how the public will react after all the lies of health agencies that they have sworn to protect? They're going to hype another vaccine and if so, does the public even respond?
body scanners
have been approved worldwide and are marketed as the next big scanning technology airport. The US, UK, Russia, Australia, Europe and Canada have installed all airport body scanners, potentially have devastating effects on health.
Many of these scanners are reportedly using terahertz waves (THz) radiation that fills the slot in the electromagnetic spectrum between microwave and infrared. Evidence suggests that although the forces generated are small, resonance effects allow waves THz to decompress dsDNA, creating bubbles in the double chain which can significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication.
as the way to the deployment of greater use of full-body scanners at US airports ran across the White House, Obama accelerate deployment because the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Administration of Transportation Safety (TSA) did not need legislation from Congress to start using the devices at any of the 560 US airports.
the White House ignored all the scientific evidence presented which suggests negative health effects. Politicians and regulators then covered up the bad publicity naked body scanners and focused on the alleged benefits under the guise of public safety.
privacy commissioners and airport authorities have also insisted that there was no risk of images that are stored or reveal personal data security personnel. Now there is new evidence to show that the scanners can do that.
According to a CNET report , another federal agency, the US Marshall Service, admitted that he had stored in actually more than 30,000 images recorded by a full body scan used in a Florida court.
A watchdog group called Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) obtained over 100 images and states on its website that "the images, which are captured routinely by the federal agency, show that body scanning devices to store and record images of individuals stripped naked." The group has filed a lawsuit to suspend the deployment of body scanners at airports.
EPIC also found that TSA actually specified to manufacturers that the machines have the ability to send and store images. The TSA says that these functions are only for testing and training and insists on its website that body scanners airport are delivered to airports with storage functions and disabled registration.
Once Moreover, the higher levels of the dome are caught lying and cheating, however, they are still left to their own devices to further manipulate and continue misrepresenting facts to the gullible public.
BP Oil Disaster
When news was developed around April 20, 2010 BP oil spill, which was worse. Instead of immediately mobilizing for action in the face of a massive public health threat, the response was to cover up, deny and respond to ignorance. After all the public always will believe them, or so they thought.
The Obama administration Interior Secretary, Ken Salazar, US Coast Guard commandant Admiral Thad Allen, energy and climate change policy adviser Carol Browner, BP and all contituents conspired to deliberately mislead the public since the beginning of the disaster until today. The worst thing is that everyone agreed to release more toxins in the Gulf pulverizing 1.8 to 2 million gallons of Corexit neurotoxin that was exposed by more than hundred scientists toxicologist and other experts have classified unequivocally irresponsible aerial spraying of chemical dispersant and large scale without nonconsensual human control and experiment environment are taking place in the Gulf region.
the was censoring the media crudely the extent of the devastation in the Gulf . Poisons - oil and Corexit are destined to spread worldwide, but honest information was and remains restricted, and many independent researchers have been arrested. Read 30 Information to demonstrate that the oil Gulf Crisis was planned .
On June 12, 2010, The Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (ISAC) released " Risk of Global climate Change oil spill BP ", a document detailing how the BP oil spill can cause irreparable damage to the activity of the global climate thermoregulation Gulf stream . Read Gulf loop destroyed power: it can lead to Shut Down thermoregulation Atlantic Quench
According to Dr. Gianluigi Zangari, an Italian theoretical physicist and senior analyst. complex and chaotic systems in Frascati National Laboratories in Italy, the Loop Current in the Gulf of Mexico has stalled as a result of the disaster BP oil spill. Zangari notes that the effects of this stop have also begun to spread to the Gulf Stream. This is because the Loop Current is a crucial element of self Gulf Stream and why is commonly known as the "main engine" of the current.
The concern now is whether or not the processes can restore natural stagnant loop current. If not, we could begin to see the flaws of world cultures from 2011.
assessment Zangari is based on daily monitoring of real-time data public data for oceanographic satellite feeds called " Real-Time mesoscale altimetry "of Jason, Topex / Poseidon, Geosat, monitoring, ERS-2 and Envisat.
These satellite foods are captured and made available to the public by NASA, NOAA and the Research Center Colorado Astrodynamics (CCAR) of the University of Colorado Boulder.
the CCAR is now being accused of scientific fraud and manipulation of data directly related to the events phenomenon surrounding the Loop current and its current anomalies. Several reporters have spear-headed the load including radio personality Dr. Bill Deagle has offered Dr. Zangari in his radio program The Nutrimedical Report which details the events leading to the destruction of the Loop Current in the Gulf.
Dr. Zangari has stated that it will no longer use the CCAR data due to their unreliability.
organized and professional Disinformation Operations
Well financed and highly organized disinformation operations are at their peak over the Internet. From forums to discuss tables and even professional websites that have only one purpose:. Defame, distract and destroy the truth
However organized, tactics are very predictable in a world full of lies and half-truths . This, unfortunately, includes all means of daily communication, one of the worst about being a source of disinformation.
disinformation campaigns are launched against those who try to uncover and expose the truth and / or conspiracy. H1N1 scandal was an excellent example of how hundreds of operations can be launched to influence opinions on the facts. For each based on the facts in realities of H1N1 vaccine article, there were two very primitive and sophisticated on message boards counters, comment forums and hundreds of alternative and conventional websites.
Stephen Barrett Quackwatch.com and supporters as skeptic.org.uk and skepticblog.com are examples of websites that promote both synthetic misinformation and organic in almost any subject that does not fit the conventional thinking.
There are specific tactics that artists tend to apply disinformation, as H. Michael Sweeney has brilliantly detailed. Also included in this material are eight common traits of the artist misinformation that may also be useful in identifying players and motives. The more fit a particular party traits and is guilty of following the rules, it is more likely to be a professional artist with a motive Disinfo created. People can be purchased, threatened or blackmailed into providing false information, so even the "good" can be suspect in many cases.
A rational person participating as one interested in the truth will evaluate that chain evidence and conclude either that the links are solid and conclusive that one or more links are weak and need further development before the conclusion can be reached, or that one or more links can break, usually invalidate ( but it is not necessarily so, if the parallel links already exist or can be found, or if a particular link was merely supportive, but not in the same key) the argument. The game is played by raising issues that either strengthen or weaken (preferably to the point of rupture) of these links. It is the work of an artist Disinfo to interfere with these evaluation ... at least make people think that the links are weak or broken, when in fact, they are not ... or to propose alternative solutions away from the truth. Often, simply preventing and delaying the process through disinformation tactics, a level of victory is assured because apathy increases with time and rhetoric.
seems true in almost all cases, if one can not break the chain of evidence for a given solution, the revelation of truth has triumphed. If either a new link, the chain is broken must be forged, or a whole new chain develops, or if the solution is not valid a new one must be found ... but the truth still wins. There is no shame in being the creator or supporter of a solution, the chain or the failed link, if done honestly seeking the truth. This is the rational approach. While it is understandable that a person can become emotionally involved with a particular side of a particular issue, it is very important who always win and when the truth wins. But the disinfo artist seek emotionalize and punish any failure (real or false claims thereof), and search through intimidation to prevent the discussion in general.
It is the artist misinformation and those who can pull their strings (those who are suffering must solve the crime) should try to avoid that rational and comprehensive examination of any chain of evidence hang. Since fact and truth seldom fall on their own, they must be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are professionals in the art of lying and deception, such as intelligence and professional criminal (often the same people or at least work together), tend to apply fairly well defined and observable in this process tools. However, the general public is not well armed against such weapons, and often easily led astray by these time-tested tactics. Surprisingly, not even media and law enforcement are not trained to deal with these problems. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of the game.
Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation
1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.
Regardless of what you know, not talk about it - especially if you are a public figure, newscaster, etc. If not reported, was not, and never have to deal with the problems.
2. Become incredulous and indignant.
Avoid discussion of key issues and instead focus on secondary issues that can be used to display the topic as critical in some other way sacrosanct group or topic. This is also known as the "How dare you! 'Gambit.
3. Create rumor-mongers.
Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, without regardless of location or evidence, as mere rumors and baseless accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a press silent because the only way the public can learn the made through such are debatable 'rumors'. If you can associate with the material from the Internet, use this fact to certify that a "wild rumor" of a "group of children on the Internet", which can not have any basis in reality.
4. Use a straw man.
Finding or creating an apparent element of the argument of his opponent that can easily touch down to make the opponent look good and look bad. Or make up a problem that can be safely assumed that there based on their interpretation of the opponent arguments / opponent / situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way that seems to reveal all charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
5. Sidetrack opponents with insults and jeers .
This is also known as the primary maneuver "attacking the messenger", although other methods qualify as variants of this approach. opponents associated with unpopular titles as' crackpots', 'rightist', 'liberal', 'left', 'terrorists',' lovers conspiracy "," radical "," militias "," racist "," religious fanatics "" sexual deviants', and so on. This makes others cringe support for fear of obtaining the same label, and avoid facing problems.
6. Hit and Run.
In any public forum, make a brief attack your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper before a response can enter combat, or simply ignore any response. This works well in environments Internet and letters-to-the-editor where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain critical thinking - just make an accusation or other attack, not discuss issues, and never answer any further answer, because that would dignify the view rival.
7. reasons interrogation.
Twisting or amplify any fact which might be interpreted as meaning that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
8. Invoke authority.
claim for itself or associate with authority and present your argument enough 'jargon' and 'small details' to illustrate you are "the one who knows" and simply say it is not so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
9. fool.
No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussion of the issues, except the negative have no credibility, no sense, provide any evidence, contain or make a point, it makes sense, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
10. associated charges opponent with old news.
A derivative straw man - usually, in any matter to large-scale high visibility, someone will make charges principles that can or already were easy to treat - a kind of investment for the future if the matter can not be so easily contained.) Where can foresee, have their own side lift a straw man business and have tried from the beginning as part of the initial contingency plans. Later, regardless of the validity or new ways exposed, usually it can then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without addressing current problems burdens - much better than the opponent is or was involved in the original source.
11. Establish and rely on fallback positions.
The use of a minor matter or element of the facts, take the "high road" and "confess" candidly that an innocent mistake, in retrospect, it was - but that opponents have taken the opportunity to to blow everything out of proportion and which would mean higher criminalities, 'just are not that'. Others may reinforce this in his name, later, and even publicly "demand an end to the nonsense 'because it has" done the right thing. " Done correctly, this can make a sympathy and respect for coming clean 'and' own 'their mistakes without addressing the most serious problems.
12. Enigmas have no solution.
Based on the general framework of the events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the whole thing too complex to solve. This makes the otherwise after the issue to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to deal with the real problems.
13. Alice in logic.
Avoid discussing topics backward reasoning or deductive logic apparent that refrains from any actual material fact.
14. demand complete solutions.
Avoid problems by requiring opponents to solve the crime in question entirely, a tactic that works best with the problems that benefit from the rule 10.
15. Conform the facts to alternate conclusions.
This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with the conclusions of contingency.
16. Vanish evidence and witnesses.
If not, is not, and you will not have to address the issue.
17. Change the subject.
Generally, in relation to one of the other tricks below, find a way to track aside the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in the hope of turning attention to a new topic , more manageable. This works especially well with peers who can 'discuss' with you the new theme and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussion of important issues.
18. emotionalize, antagonize, Goad and opponents.
If you can not do anything else, chide and taunt their opponents and lure them to the emotional responses that tend to make silly and overly motivated look, and generally make their material somewhat less consistent. Not only will you avoid the discussion of issues in the first instance, but your emotional response even if the problem is solved, you can avoid further problems then focus on how 'are sensitive to criticism. "
19. Ignoring the facts presented, demand the impossible tests.
This is perhaps a variant of the rule 'silly'. Regardless of what material can be presented by an opponent in public forums, claiming the irrelevant material and require proof that it is impossible for the opponent to get (which may exist, but not be available, or may be something that is known to be destroyed or retained as a weapon crime.) in order to completely avoid the problems of discussions, it may be necessary for you to deny categorically and be critical of the media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have no meaning or relevance
20. false evidence
Whenever possible, introduce new facts or evidence designed and manufactured in conflict with presentations opponent.. - helpful to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution tools. This works best when the offense is designed for the purpose of contingencies, and the facts can not be easily separated from the fabrications.
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other body authorized investigation.
Subvert the (process) for their benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once gathered, the evidence and testimony to be secret when handled properly are required. For example, if you are the owner Prosecutor, you can ensure a grand jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is inaccessible to seals a subsequent researchers. Once a verdict is reached, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but can also be used to get the charges when it comes to framing a victim.
22. Making a new truth.
Create your own expert (s), group (s), author (s), the leader (s) of influence on existing willing to forge a new path through scientific research or testimony, research, or social which concludes favorably. Thus, whether to actually solve some problems, you can do so with authority.
23. Create bigger distractions.
If there appears the above to be working to divert attention from issues sensitive, or to prevent the media unwanted events unstoppable such as essays, creating big news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the crowds.
24. silence critics.
If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues entirely eliminated. This can be by his death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of character for the release of information blackmail, or simply economic, emotional or seriously damage your health destroying them.
25 . Vanish.
If you are a holder of the key to the secrets or other excessively lit mode and believed that the heat gets too hot, to avoid problems, vacating the kitchen.
Disinformationalist eight traits
1) the resolution
never really discussed problems front or provide constructive contributions, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, it simply imply this, that and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies knowledge authority and expert in the art without any other justification for credibility.
2) Selectivity
tend to pick and choose carefully opponents either by applying the approach of hit and run against mere commentators support of opponents, or focusing on key opponents heavier attacks that are known to directly address issues. If a commentator become argumentative with some success, the focus will shift to include the commenter also.
3) Coinciding
tend to appear suddenly and slightly chance with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions particularly involved in the public arena. But they also tend to disappear once the issue is no longer of general interest. They were probably directed or chosen to be there for a reason, and disappear with reason.
4) Teamwork
They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packages or equipment. He graduated in Public and Environmental Health Science and is a professional speaker on topics such as disease prevention, environmental toxins and health policy. }; cs var = []; (Key var params) qs.push (key + '=' + encodeURIComponent (params [key])); var s = d.createElement ( 'script'); input[type="submit"]{background:url("http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-5wcFZIZJkN0/VIB5Zjgby-I/AAAAAAAADko/3FYE_NnvoPQ/s1600/Red.png") repeating shift 0 0 transparent;color:#FFF;cursor:pointer;font-family:arial;font-size:16px;font-weight:bold;height:40px;margin-top:5px;padding:8px input[type="submit"]{background:url("http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-OB93q7XRC90/VIB5ZFWhkvI/AAAAAAAADkk/sboB95B9BfI/s1600/NBL.png") repeating shift 0 0 transparent;color:#FFF;cursor:pointer;font-family:arial;font-size:16px;font-weight:bold;height:37px;padding:5px;text-transform:capitalize;border:0;float:left;margin-left:10px}#optin-single entry [type="submit"]: hover {background: none repeat scroll 0 0 # 333}
"Everything Is A Lie: The Deliberate Intent To Deceive People Is At An All Time High", article source: riseearth.com
Thanks for Reading Everything Is A Lie: The Deliberate Intent To Deceive People Is At An All Time High
Thank you for reading this Everything Is A Lie: The Deliberate Intent To Deceive People Is At An All Time High, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Everything Is A Lie: The Deliberate Intent To Deceive People Is At An All Time High Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2014/04/everything-is-lie-deliberate-intent-to.html
0 Response to "Everything Is A Lie: The Deliberate Intent To Deceive People Is At An All Time High"
Post a Comment