Don't Listen To The Sunscreen Industry - Spending 3 Hours In The Sun Per Day Reduces Breast Cancer Up To 50 Percent -Health & Beauty Informations. This article, entitled Don't Listen To The Sunscreen Industry - Spending 3 Hours In The Sun Per Day Reduces Breast Cancer Up To 50 Percent, we have prepared this article carefully for you so you can retrieve information therein. Hopefully you understand the contents of this article that we put under the category health, well, happy reading.

Title : Don't Listen To The Sunscreen Industry - Spending 3 Hours In The Sun Per Day Reduces Breast Cancer Up To 50 Percent
link : Don't Listen To The Sunscreen Industry - Spending 3 Hours In The Sun Per Day Reduces Breast Cancer Up To 50 Percent

Don't Listen To The Sunscreen Industry - Spending 3 Hours In The Sun Per Day Reduces Breast Cancer Up To 50 Percent

By Marco Torres - PreventDisease

always hear doctors, public health agencies and the largest associations of cancer in the country tell us to stay out of the sun to prevent cancer. "The foaming sunscreen and protect your skin at all times" is the most consistent message promoted as a broken record when the temperature increases. What happens is that Mr. Sunshine is responsible for slashing the risk of breast cancer by up to 50 percent. Could all these health professionals and public health experts be wrong? You better believe it!

Blocking the sun's rays reach our skin dramatically influences our optimal levels of vitamin D, leading to higher mortality, critical illness and mental health disorders. Ironically, sunscreen itself causes cancer.

Regular exposure to sunlight can have a powerful effect against cancer by stimulating the production of vitamin D in the skin. A team of researchers at the Cancer Center of Northern California, the University of Southern California, and Wake Medical School Forest University found that increased exposure to sunlight - which increases levels of vitamin D in the body - can reduce the risk of advanced breast cancer. Women with high sun exposure had half the risk of developing advanced breast cancer, which is cancer that has spread beyond the breast, compared to women with low sun exposure cancer.

exposure to the sun in the summer months and supplemental vitamin D3 in the winter months it can be one of the best measures of protection against breast cancer. "If future studies continue to show reductions in the risk of breast cancer associated with sun exposure, increasing vitamin D intake from diet and supplements may be the safest solution to achieve adequate levels of vitamin D" said Gary Schwartz, Ph.D., a co -Researcher the Comprehensive Center of Wake Medical School University cancer forest.

Laboratory tests suggest breast cells are able to convert vitamin D to a hormone that has anti-cancer properties. Canadian researchers compared 3,101 breast cancer victims with 3,471 healthy women who had not suffered tumors.

Each of them was asked about the amount of time spent outdoors between April and October for four stages of life: teens, twenties and thirties, forties and fifties and 60-74.

the results, published in American Journal of Epidemiology , showed that women who had at least 21 hours of exposure per week to the sun's UV rays in their teens were one 29 percent less likely to develop cancer than those who received less than one hour a day.

For women who went out side most of the time in their forties and fifties, the risk was reduced by 26 percent and for those above 60, sunshine halved the odds a tumor.

Meanwhile, men who get the recommended amount of vitamin D are less likely to suffer heart attacks or strokes, according to a study.

The US research, which followed nearly 119,000 adults for two decades that men who received at least 600 IU of vitamin D per day are were 16 percent less likely to develop problems heart or stroke than men who received less than 100 IUD. But there was no such pattern among women, researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health found.

A history of corruption and deceit Charities Protector Solar Industry and cancer

Industry sunscreen makes money by selling lotion products that actually contain chemicals that cause cancer. Then donates a portion of that money to the cancer industry through groups nonprofit as Cancer Societies, which, in turn, public service announcements that break the heart and charity events such as running relay for Life urging people to donate and use sunscreen to "prevent cancer."

the cancer establishment has withdrawn from the truth. What began as a sincere inquiry into the economic causes of a complex set of 200 different diseases, at the turn of the 20th century, it quickly degenerated into a unilateral approach. All societies of cancer are now dedicated to pharmaceutical companies funding "find the cure" that will never exist, at least not any mainstream institution.

Devra Davis, one of the sharpest epidemiologists America North "surprising alliances between academics too smart naive or far and people with major economic interests in the sale of potentially cancerous materials have prevented us find out whether or not many modern products affect the chances of developing cancer." She has documented how some of the most prominent cancer researchers in the world secretly working for chemical companies without disclosing these links by publishing studies.

work Davis steal any persistent fantasies Disney- as you might have entertained about the nobility of the fundraising campaigns of cancer actually does a good job of cancer patients. Please do NOT support companies or relays American or Canadian lifetime cancer.

Many grants that fund cancer research are supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Research Foundation Melanoma . The NCI is the same federally funded (and privately funded by Big Pharma) organization promoting mammography through ionizing radiation. In fact, they are one of the biggest promoters of mammography in the nation. They are sent by the biotechnology sector and typically employ pharmaceutical executives on their boards.

The Melanoma Research Foundation (MRF) is filled with members of scientific advice to conflicts of interest statements covering his academic work . Decision makers in MRF are all current or former pharmaceutical executives or board members.

Why sunscreen never prevent cancer and could do

the sun does not cause cancer. Researchers have concluded that UVA exposure has not contributed to the increased incidence of melanoma in the last 30 years. UVA accounts for 90 percent of the ultraviolet light spectrum of sunlight.

"Our data refute the only direct evidence that UVA causes melanoma, which does not mean that UVA is harmless" said lead study author David Mitchell, Ph.D., professor in the Department of Carcinogenesis located in the Science Park MD Anderson - - Research Division in Smithville, Texas. "UVA is just not as dangerous as we thought because it does not cause melanoma."

Both UVA and UVB can cause tanning and burning, although UVB does so much faster. UVA, however, penetrates the skin more deeply than UVB

UVB appears to be protective against melanoma. -. Or rather, the vitamin D that the body produces in response to UVB radiation is protective

As it is written in The Lancet

"Paradoxically, workers at outdoors have a lower risk of melanoma compared to indoor workers, suggesting that chronic exposure to sunlight may have a protective effect. "

So if UVA and UVB rays do not cause melanoma, why use sunscreen?

rates of skin cancer are increasing and so-called experts still blame the sun for a problem made here on earth.

If the sun was actually causing skin cancer, sunscreen and if it stopped, we would be free of cancer for now. We are already spending less time outdoors than ever, and losing billions of dollars a year in lotions, creams and dangerous innecesarias.Mientras therefore only a couple of generations, we spend much more time in the sun and sunscreen ZILCH - and skin cancer was virtually unknown.

After decades of debate, several governments have failed to establish mandatory safety standards sunscreen. Companies are free to make their own decisions on everything from advertising claims to product quality. The underlying message is that applications of sunscreen are currently conducting risks far outweigh any benefit to the public.

comprehensive scientific reviews indicate that 83% of the 785 sunscreen products containing ingredients with serious security problems. Only 17% of the products on the market block UVA and UVB rays, which is the purpose intended by the manufacturers of sunscreen so, what is the point? The assessment by the Skin Environmental Working Group of the database Deep was based on a review of more than 400 scientific studies, industry models the effectiveness of the sunscreen, and toxicity and regulatory information housed in nearly 60 government, academic, and databases in the industry.

At least 50% of the products on the market bear claims that are considered "unacceptable" or misleading under safety standards for sunscreen. An analysis of marketing claims hundreds of protective creams shows that false and misleading marketing claims are common. They give consumers a false sense of security (based on myths) with statements like "all the protection of the days", "mild as water," and "blocks all harmful rays" which are completely false, however they are in the bottles.

Consumers could assume that, because researchers have implicated ultraviolet light in the development of skin cancer sunscreen automatically prevents skin cancer. Play this train consumption fear and hope an issue should not even be a problem ... blocking the sun!

A review of the literature shows that some of the sunscreen ingredients absorbed into the blood, and some are linked to toxic effects. Some release skin-damaging free radicals in sunlight, some act like estrogen and could disrupt hormone systems, several are strongly linked to allergic reactions, and others can accumulate in the body or the environment .

Almost two dozen lawsuits have been filed against Johnson & Johnson Inc., Schering-Plough Corp., Playtex Products Inc., Tanning Research Laboratories Inc. and Chattem Inc participation of some of the most popular brands, including Coppertone, Banana Boat, Hawaiian Tropic, Bullfrog and Neutrogena -. charge manufacturers claims about sunscreens are inflated, lulling consumers into believing that their products are safe when they have been shown to cause cancer

Almost half of the 500 products most popular sunscreen may actually increase the rate at which the malignant cells and the spread of skin cancer are developed, and containing vitamin a or retinol and its derivatives palmitate retinol, which accelerate tumor growth.

in a one-year study, tumors and lesions developed up to 21 percent faster in lab animals coated in a vitamin a-laced cream than animals treated with free cream vitamin, EWG report stated based on its analysis of the initial findings released by the FDA and the National Toxicology Program.

based on the strength of the results obtained by the own FDA scientists, many in the community of public health say they can not believe or understand why the agency has not already notified the public of the potential dangers.

scientists have reported that the size particle affects toxicity of zinc oxide, a material widely used in sunscreens . Particles smaller than 100 nanometers are slightly more toxic to cells of the colon conventional zinc oxide. zinc oxide solid was more toxic than equivalent amounts of soluble zinc, and requires direct contact of particles cell to cause cell death. Their study is in ACS Chemical Research in Toxicology, a monthly journal.

The Environmental Working Group that analyzed 15 previous studies on nanoparticles on sunscreen says no studies have evaluated increasingly absorption through the damaged skin. Such data are "almost all of the 17 sunscreen chemicals approved for use in the US" Scientists say that a concern is that children who accidentally ingest zinc oxide nano-sized.

Another common and toxic ingredient in sunscreens is titanium dioxide. New research published in the journal ACS 'Environmental Science & Technology found that Children may be receiving the greatest exposure to nanoparticles of titanium dioxide . The geometry of nanowires based on titanium dioxide (TiO2) appears to play a crucial role in the cytotoxicity have a dependent effect of the strong dose in the cell proliferation and cell death.

An extensive study by researchers Jonsson Comprehensive cancer UCLA found that titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles, found in everything from cosmetics to sunscreen to paint to vitamins, caused systemic genetic damage in mice. TiO2 nanoparticles DNA breaks caused single and double strand and also caused chromosomal damage as well as inflammation, all of which increase the risk of cancer.

Vitamin D from the sun is the key to preventing disease

The scientific evidence, however, shows clearly that sunscreen actually promotes cancer by blocking the absorption body of ultraviolet radiation, which produces vitamin D in the skin. Vitamin D, as recent studies have shown, prevents up to 77 of all cancers in women (breast cancer, colon cancer, cervical cancer, lung cancer, brain tumors, multiple myeloma, etc.). Meanwhile, toxic chemical ingredients used in most sunscreen products are actually carcinogenic and have never been safety tested. They are absorbed through the skin (a porous body that absorbs most of the substances contact) and enter the bloodstream.

In recent years, there has been considerable interest in the role of vitamin D plays in improving health and disease prevention. Previous findings show that low levels of vitamin D have been associated directly with the various forms of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Stephen B. Kritchevsky, PhD, Professor of Internal Medicine and Science Transition in the Wake Forest School of Medicine found a significant correlation.

"We observed vitamin D insufficiency (defined as blood levels lower than 20 ng / ml), in one-third of study participants. This was associated with an increase of almost 50 percent in the mortality rate in older adults, "Kritchevsky said. "Our findings suggest that low levels of vitamin D may be a major public health problem for our nation's seniors."

Cedric F. Garland, Dr.PH, cancer prevention specialist Center cancer Moores University of California, San Diego (UCSD) and colleagues estimate that 250,000 cases of colorectal cancer and 350,000 cases of breast cancer could be prevented worldwide by increasing intake of vitamin D3 , particularly in countries north of Ecuador. "For the first time, we are talking about 600,000 cases of breast and colorectal cancer could be prevented each year worldwide, including nearly 150,000 in the United States," Garland said.

Although vitamin D is you can get limited dietary sources and directly from sun exposure during the spring and summer, the combination of poor diet and sun avoidance has created vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency in large proportions of many populations around the world.

it is known that vitamin D has a wide range of physiological effects and exist correlations between insufficient amounts of vitamin D and a higher incidence of several cancers . These correlations are particularly strong for cancers of the digestive tract, including colon cancer, and certain forms of leukemia.

Spending an average of three hours a day exposed to sunlight can reduce the risk breast to cancer by 50 percent .

people with high blood levels of vitamin D live significantly longer that people who have low levels of vitamin .

a new study from University College London in the UK found that people with higher levels of vitamin D had a risk 43% lower depression, compared to people with higher levels of vitamin D lower.

The results published in Clinical Nutrition also indicated that levels of vitamin D were associated with a 67% lower risk of panic, compared with the lowest levels.

"The high burden of mental and behavioral disorders and concurrent high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (less than 75nmol / l) worldwide (29) highlight the potential importance of our findings "they wrote the researchers, led by Jane Maddock UCL Institute of child Health.

people with the highest levels of vitamin D have a lower risk of skin cancer. Sure, you can get some of that from a pill ... but historically, most people have gotten away with D straight from the source: the sun and protect 100 years ago with clothes, cream or anything I could have seen his own mental health disorder.

How to make your own non-toxic sunscreen

While the sun does not cause cancer, which is not in your best interest to burn the skin. So if you are prone to burning easily, try making your own natural sunscreen extend its exposure.

New York Times bestselling author Sophie Uliano of gorgeously green and his new book dO GORGEOUSLY shows how to make your own non-toxic sunscreen in less than 4 minutes.

Please skip zinc oxide from the recipe to make a finely natural and toxic free version of this sunscreen, especially during preparation. Zinc oxide can affect the lungs and reproductive system if inhaled. Replace zinc oxide with 1 tablespoon of avocado oil which helps increase the sun protection factor (SPF).

Recipe: (SPF 6-8)

• 2 tablespoons of virgin coconut oil
• 1 tablespoon butter shea
• 1 tablespoon avocado oil
• 1/2 teaspoon sesame oil
• 1/2 teaspoon of Aloe Vera gel

note that this recipe will not be allowed to stay in the sun for hours without burning, even if you have darker skin. If you have pale skin and are prone to burn in very short periods, this recipe will only modestly protect you when UV rays are at their maximum strength. intermittent periods spent in the shade are highly recommended to balance the UV dose received.

For those who As well, this lotion will give you an excellent color and luster if used daily, while spending a minimum of 30 minutes in the sun.

Although it is not waterproof, it is waterproof if applied thoroughly and spread evenly. In direct sunlight, you must reapply a thin layer of lotion every half hour for optimal results

Spread the word:.. Please promote the use of non-toxic sunscreens

Sources:
ewg.org
preventdisease.com
jhu.edu
sciencedaily.com
aolnews.com
ucsd.edu

Marco Torres is a research lawyer, writer and consumer lifestyles healthy. He graduated in Public and Environmental Health Science and is a professional speaker on topics such as disease prevention, environmental toxins and health policy.

"Don't Listen To The Sunscreen Industry - Spending 3 Hours In The Sun Per Day Reduces Breast Cancer Up To 50 Percent", article source: riseearth.com

Thanks for Reading Don't Listen To The Sunscreen Industry - Spending 3 Hours In The Sun Per Day Reduces Breast Cancer Up To 50 Percent

Thank you for reading this Don't Listen To The Sunscreen Industry - Spending 3 Hours In The Sun Per Day Reduces Breast Cancer Up To 50 Percent, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Don't Listen To The Sunscreen Industry - Spending 3 Hours In The Sun Per Day Reduces Breast Cancer Up To 50 Percent Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2014/04/don-listen-to-sunscreen-industry.html