225,000 American patients die in doctors’ hands: silence of the lambs -Health & Beauty Informations. This article, entitled 225,000 American patients die in doctors’ hands: silence of the lambs, we have prepared this article carefully for you so you can retrieve information therein. Hopefully you understand the contents of this article that we put under the category conspiracy, well, happy reading.

Title : 225,000 American patients die in doctors’ hands: silence of the lambs
link : 225,000 American patients die in doctors’ hands: silence of the lambs

225,000 American patients die in doctors’ hands: silence of the lambs

In my previous article, I discussed Silence of the Lambs (media) concerning collusion between Monsanto and the FDA .

In the case of health care in the United States, that silence intentional queen also.

by the most conservative estimate, researched and published by conventional medical sources, the US medical system kills 225,000 people each year.

that's 2.25 million deaths per decade.

One would think that a fact so amazing would give an endless series of page one stories in the press, along with the state first story in the evening news to the network.

But no. It is wall to wall of silence.

Why? We can list the usual reasons, dollars medical / pharmaceutical advertising spend on television and in newspapers are the most obvious reason.

We have the reality that, of the 225,000 annual deaths, 106,000 occur as effect direct pharmaceutical drugs. The FDA is the only government agency responsible for certifying all medicines as safe and effective before they are released for public use. Any exposure of medical mortality statistics automatically accuse the FDA. The mainstream media will not face the FDA at that level.

One of the many truths come to light in the case that the press attacked the FDA full- in? The FDA spends an enormous amount of time, energy and money going after the nutritional supplement industry, which makes virtually no deaths in a year or decade.

The public, of course, discover that by certification of medical as safe and effective drugs, drugs that kill, like clockwork, 106,000 people a year, the FDA is colluding with, and serving, the big pharmaceutical companies.

can not approve many drugs that cause so much human destruction through sheer incompetence. FDA apologists might think so, but they are terribly wrong. They are whistling in the dark, relying on the "science" as our guide.

Since I have been reporting these death from medical point of view-figures-started 12 years ago, people told me, " this is impossible. If it were true, the media would report that. "

this argument is upside down. The statistics are real and true. In fact, it is very low estimates. Therefore, the press is colluding to keep them well below the radar.

The mainstream press is designed to be able to remain silent on issues like this. It is part of their job. Although many reporters and editors are simply ignorant and clueless, at the highest levels of the media we are looking at pure manipulation. We search the crime of accomplice to murder.

I do not say that the murder in any way not literal. It is murder because when the facts are known, when you know what is a government institution (FDA) is doing to the people, and when that institution itself is well aware of its lethal impact on the public and does anything about it, year after year, decade after decade, is murder by the FDA and is the media accessory to murder.

not simply negligent homicide. No negligence here, any more than there would be if a loaded gun into the street and started shooting randomly at the crowd of people is taken.

Underneath it all, the press keeps silence, because they are not allows them to drive a huge fracture in what is called "public trust."

And what it is the public trust? It is the delusion that basically things are fine. That is the easiest way to say it. Things are good.

They are especially well when it comes to the medical profession. Doctors are modern priests in white coats.

But the priests are the ones who are prescribing drugs that are killing people. If the extent of his crimes became known, confidence would evaporate within seconds. And not only trust in the medical profession. Trust, or the lack of it, is contagious. It spreads to other areas quickly.

"Well, if they are lying abut this and kill people, then who is more lying and killing?"

"We know that people die in wars. But doctors are supposed to be saving lives. it's not supposed drug administration people who kill at a rate of 106,000 per year, every year. "

the press and people who own media companies are aware that they are the guardians of the public trust. However, that has nothing to do with telling the truth. The press is monitoring the illusion of truth. That's the way they interpret their mandate.

Nowhere is this clearer than in the medical field perversion.

___________________________________

As I do occasionally , I am presenting my interview with Dr. Barbara Starfield deceased, who for many years was a public health authority revered at the Johns Hopkins School of public health. She was the researcher who exposed the truth about the death caused by medical reasons in the US.

Your opinion, "Is US health really the best in the world?" Was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association on July 26, 2000.

three key facts was presented. Every year, the US medical system kills 225,000 people. 106,000 die from the direct effects of medical drugs approved by the FDA. 119,000 die from the effects of treatment in hospitals.

Shortly after his review was published, he gained some media attention. No attention headline, but the press published the news. Then, as a report of a car accident or a storm, the revelation of Starfield disappeared, vanished without a trace.

In other articles, I made clear that the newsprint Starfield is confirmed by other sources . In fact, on a page of the website itself FDA admits that 100,000 people die each year in the United States from the effects of pharmaceutical drugs . However, as in the case of each psychotic criminal, the FDA is not responsible

____________________________________

Following are excerpts from the interview with Dr. Barbara Starfield are presented.

What has been the level and tenor of the response to its findings, from 2000?

The American public seems to have been duped into believing that a greater number of interventions lead to better health, and most people I know are fully aware that the US does not have the "best health in the world '.

In the medical research community, have their statistics of mortality due to medical reasons been discussed, or have been accepted those figures, though a certain degree of shame?

the results have been accepted by those who study them. it has not been a single detractor, former dean of the medical school, which has received much attention for claiming that the health system in the United States is the best there is and have more of the same. He has a great interest in medical schools and teaching hospitals (which are his constituency).

have health agencies of the federal government consulted with you on ways to mitigate [devastating] effects of the medical system in the United States?

NO.

Since the FDA approves all medical drugs given to the American people, and that is as safe and effective, how can that agency to remain calm in the fact that these drugs are causing 106,000 deaths per year?

Although there will always be adverse events that can not be foreseen, the fact is that increasingly unsafe drugs are being approved for use. Many people attribute the fact that the pharmaceutical industry is (for the last ten years or so) required to pay the FDA for review [of its new drugs] which puts the FDA in an untenable position working for the industry being regulated. There is extensive literature on this.

findings are not a serious accusation 2000 FDA and standard practices?

are an indictment of the industry health care US: insurance companies, specialty and medical academy disease-oriented, the manufacturing of pharmaceutical devices and all which contributes greatly to reelection campaigns of members of Congress. The problem is that we have a government that is free from the influence of vested interests. Unfortunately, [it] is a general problem of our society, which clearly imbalanced democracy.

can offer an opinion on how the FDA can be so deadly wrong so many drugs?

Yes, you can not shake the vested interests. (Again, [there is] is an extensive literature on this subject, particularly unrecognized by the people because the media supported by the industry that give no attention.)

Would it be correct to say that when his JAMA study was published in 2000, which caused a momentary stir and was subsequently ignored by the medical community and pharmaceutical companies?

Are you sure it was a momentary shock? I still get at least one email a day to request a reprint and ten years later! The problem is that your message is obscured by those who do not want any change in the health system of the United States.

Are you aware of any systematic effort, since their study of JAMA 2000 published, to remedy the main categories of deaths caused by medical reasons in the US?

No systematic efforts are made; However, there has been a lot of studies. Most of them indicate higher rates [of death] than calculated.

What was your personal reaction when it came to the conclusion that the medical system in the United States was the third leading cause of death in the US?

I had previously done studies on international comparisons and knew there was a serious deficit in the health system of the United States, especially in the absence of universal coverage and a very bad primary care infrastructure . So I was not surprised.

Does your 2000 JAMA study sail through peer review, or was some opposition to publish it?

was rejected by the first day I sent him, arguing that "it would be interesting to readers'!

The 106,000 deaths from medical drugs only involve drugs prescribed to patients in hospitals, or has this statistic also cover people prescribed drugs that are not on patients in hospitals?

I tried all in my calculations . Since the commentary was written, many more dangerous drugs were added to the market.

Jon Rappoport

the author of an explosive collection MATRIX REVEALED , Jon was a candidate for a seat in the US Congress in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer prize, has worked as an investigative journalist for 30 years, writing articles about politics, medicine and health CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has given lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for their free email messages to www.nomorefakenews.com

Source: InfoWars.com

"225,000 American patients die in doctors’ hands: silence of the lambs", article source: riseearth.com

Thanks for Reading 225,000 American patients die in doctors’ hands: silence of the lambs

Thank you for reading this 225,000 American patients die in doctors’ hands: silence of the lambs, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article 225,000 American patients die in doctors’ hands: silence of the lambs Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2013/03/225000-american-patients-die-in-doctors.html