Senate Agrees on “DARK Act” GMO Labeling Bill -Health & Beauty Informations. This article, entitled Senate Agrees on “DARK Act” GMO Labeling Bill, we have prepared this article carefully for you so you can retrieve information therein. Hopefully you understand the contents of this article that we put under the category gmo, well, happy reading.

Title : Senate Agrees on “DARK Act” GMO Labeling Bill
link : Senate Agrees on “DARK Act” GMO Labeling Bill

Senate Agrees on “DARK Act” GMO Labeling Bill

The US Senate It has announced a bipartisan agreement that will prevent states labeling of genetically modified foods in favor of a federal system of labeling. This is what you need to know ...

by Derrick Broze

On Thursday, the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and forestry agreed on a new bill for the labeling of foods with genetically modified ingredients. The committee has been trying for several months to get a bill passed before the labeling law Vermont enters into force on 1 July

US Committee Chairman Senate Agriculture Pat Roberts, and member Debbie Stabenow issued a statement , calling the bill "an important way forward represents a real commitment.


Since time is of the essence, we urge our colleagues to act quickly to support this bill. "Roberts said that if his teammates did not act on the bill now Vermont law will cause market confusion .

The bill would give the Department of Agriculture US two years to write the rules on labeling.

The bipartisan proposal immediately prohibit states and cities of the adoption of laws labeling of modified or genetically engineered ingredients.

modified or genetically engineered seeds are engineered to have certain traits, such as resistance to herbicides.

Most corn and soybean crops in the US are now GE, including a large part used for animal feed.

The bill also put the USDA responsible for establishing "a standard national dissemination uniform for human consumption that is or may be bioengineering."

Critics of a concern about USDA federal standard being pressured by biotech companies that have a close relationship with US regulators.

The proposal would also require companies producing food with genetically modified ingredients to place a label including the text in the package, a symbol, or a link to a website (QR code or similar technology). the smaller food manufacturers can use Web sites or phone numbers to reveal the ingredients.

In late February, Roberts introduced another bill , who tried to create a federal standard for voluntary labeling of GM foods. Roberts SB 2609, or the Law of Biotechnology labeling solutions, have blocked efforts by states mandatory labeling.

In March, the bill failed to reach the 60 votes necessary for a procedural vote, with 49 votes in favor and 48 votes against.

Roberts bill was similar to insurance and food Labelling Act, which passed the House in June 2015, but precise issue ultimately failed amid strong opposition.

For critics, the bill was known as the "dark" (US Denying the right to know) Act because the law also sought to nullify the measures labeling of GMOs as the bill passed in Vermont .

The last bipartisan effort contains language which is identical to both of the above bills.

The bill "to amend the Law of Agricultural Marketing 1946 to require the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a voluntary national standard for labeling genetically modified foods."

is safe to say that this new bipartisan compromise is simply the latest version of the dark Law and probably will live up to its name, keeping Americans in the dark about what is in their food.

The bipartisan proposal is supported by certain groups of the food industry who believe state like Vermont accounts will result in higher costs for agriculture, businesses and consumers.

"This bipartisan agreement assures consumers across the country can obtain clear and consistent information about their food and beverage ingredients and avoids a patchwork of labeling laws been confusing and costly," Pamela Bailey, president of the Grocery Manufacturers Association, the biggest lobbyist in the food sector told the Associated Press .

Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch, said the new bill deserves the DARK Law name because it will prevent consumers from having "clear labels and on-package" as required by law Vermont .

"However, this agreement Senators Stabenow and Roberts does not even come close, and instead requires that consumers have smart phones and cell phone signal to know what they are buying," Hauter he said in a statement .

"This agreement seems to be designed to ensure that large food processing companies and the biotechnology industry continue to profit by misleading consumers."

Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin and Senator Bernie Sanders both spoke against the new measure.

Shumlin criticized the delay of two years, while Sanders said he would do "everything it can" to stop the bill.

Meanwhile, reports the Huffington Post that the bill "also allows companies to avoid the main consumers have demanded - a quick and easy way to determine if a food product they are buying is made use of genetically modified crops. "

The key argument seems to be that the new bill would not have labels as clear as the law of Vermont.

Senator Stabenow, however, believes the opposite, claiming that the Vermont law would require labeling of GMOs of a cheese pizza, but is not a pepperoni pizza .

"Throughout this process I worked to ensure that any agreement would recognize the scientific consensus that biotechnology is safe, while also making consumers safe are entitled to know what is in your food" Senator wrote.

The scientific consensus not inclined towards the safety of GM foods, but that has not influenced labeling critics and supporters.

A recent report by the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine and came to the conclusion GM foods pose no health risk or the environment.

Critics point to report conflicts of interest among researchers of the National Academy of Sciences and biotechnology companies involved in the creation of transgenic crops.

The organization of environmental monitoring Food and Water Watch released its own report, which points to the possible influence of the same organizations that benefit from the growth of genetic engineering of food.

The report Under the Influence: The Superior Council of Scientific Research and genetically modified organisms , look at the "ties of long-range" between the Higher Council for Scientific Research, its parent organization NAS, and agricultural biotechnology companies and corporations.

Americans who want to know what's in your food needs to take control of their own food production and stop relying on a large scale, industrial agriculture that is increasingly based on genetically modified seeds .

Only by recovering energy when it comes to our diet can stop supporting the systems that are working against our health and freedom. It's time to grow food, not grass.

Time to throw seed bombs worldwide. The revolution is growing and the resistance is fertile.

Thanks for Reading Senate Agrees on “DARK Act” GMO Labeling Bill

Thank you for reading this Senate Agrees on “DARK Act” GMO Labeling Bill, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Senate Agrees on “DARK Act” GMO Labeling Bill Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2016/06/senate-agrees-on-dark-act-gmo-labeling.html