Top 10 Cannabis Studies the Government Wished it Had Never Funded -Health & Beauty Informations. This article, entitled Top 10 Cannabis Studies the Government Wished it Had Never Funded, we have prepared this article carefully for you so you can retrieve information therein. Hopefully you understand the contents of this article that we put under the category alternative-medicine, well, happy reading.

Title : Top 10 Cannabis Studies the Government Wished it Had Never Funded
link : Top 10 Cannabis Studies the Government Wished it Had Never Funded

Top 10 Cannabis Studies the Government Wished it Had Never Funded

10) Marijuana does not have effect on mortality: a massive study of California HMO members funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) found that marijuana use caused no significant increase in mortality. Snuff consumption was associated with an increased risk of death.
Sidney, S et al. Marijuana use and mortality. American Journal of Public Health. Vol. 87 No. 4, April 1997, p. 585-590. September 2002.


9) High consumption of marijuana as a young adult will not ruin his life: Veterans Affairs scientists looked at whether the heavy marijuana as a adult caused long-term problems later, studying identical twins in which one twin had been a marijuana user for a year or longer but had stopped at least one month prior to the study, while the second twin had used marijuana no more than five times each time. Marijuana use had no significant impact on the physical use or mental health care, the health-related quality of life, or current socio-demographic characteristics.
Eisen SE et al. It makes use of marijuana have residual adverse effects of measures perceived health, socio-demographic or quality of life? A study of Monozygotic Co-fold in men control. Addiction. Vol. 97 No. 9. p.1083-1086. September 1997


8), the "Door Effect" can be a mirage: Marijuana is often called "drug" by supporters of the ban , pointing to "associations" statistic that indicates that people who use marijuana are more likely to eventually try hard drugs than those who never used marijuana - implying that marijuana causes somehow consumption hard drugs. However, a model developed by RAND Corp. researcher Andrew Morral demonstrates that these associations can be explained "without effect gateway required." It is more likely that this study funded by the federal government suggests, some people simply have an underlying propensity to try drugs, and start with what is most readily available.
Morral AR, McCaffrey D and Paddock S. Reassessing the gateway effects of marijuana. Addiction. December 2002. p. 1493-1504.





7) prohibition does not work (PART I): the White House had the National Research Council to examine the data gathered about drug use and the effects of drug policy US. NRC concluded, "the nation has little information on the effectiveness of current drug policy, especially the fight against drugs." And what data exist show "little apparent relationship between severity of sanctions prescribed for drug use and prevalence or frequency of use." In that is, there is no evidence that the prohibition - the cornerstone of drug policy in the United States for a century -. reduces drug use
Higher Council for Scientific Research. Inform the US policy against illegal drugs: What we know not still hurts us. National Academy Press, 2001. p. 193.


6) Prohibition does not work (PART II): SE PROHIBITION cause the "gateway effect") :? American and Dutch researchers, supported in part by NIDA, marijuana users compared in San Francisco, where no medical use remains illegal, to Amsterdam, where adults can possess and buy small amounts of marijuana from regulated businesses . As for parameters such as frequency and quantity of use and age of first use, they found no differences except one: the lifetime use of hard drugs was significantly lower in Amsterdam, with its policies of "tolerant" marijuana. For example, the lifetime use of crack was 4.5 times higher in San Francisco in Amsterdam. Reinarman, C, Cohen, PDA, and Kaal, HL. The limited relevance of Drug Policy: Cannabis in Amsterdam and San Francisco
American Journal of Public Health.. Vol. 94, No. 5. May 2004. p. 836-842.

5) OOPS, marijuana can prevent cancer (PART I): Federal researchers implanted several types of cancer, including leukemia and lung cancer in mice, and then treated with cannabinoids (unique, active components found in marijuana). THC and other cannabinoids shrank tumors and increased life expectancy of mice. Munson, AE et al. antineoplastic activity of cannabinoids.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. September 1975. p. 597-602.


4) OOPS, marijuana can prevent cancer, (PART II): In a 1994 study, the government tried to suppress, federal researchers gave mice and rats massive doses of THC, looking for cancers or other signs of toxicity. The rodents given THC lived longer and had fewer cancers, "in a dose dependent manner" (ie, the more THC they got, the fewer tumors). NTP Technical Report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 1-trans-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, CAS 03/08/1972 in F344 / N rats and B6C3F mice, gavage studies.
See also, "Medical Marijuana: Unpublished federal study found THC-treated rats lived longer, had fewer cancer," AIDS Treatment News no. 263 January 17, 1997




3 ) UNRWA, marijuana can prevent cancer (PART III): Researchers at the Kaiser-Permanente HMO, funded by NIDA, followed 65,000 patients for nearly a decade, comparing cancer rates among nonsmokers, smokers snuff and marijuana smokers. Snuff smokers had higher rates massively lung cancer and other cancers. Marijuana smokers who do not use snuff also had no increase in risk associated with snuff or risk of cancer in general cancers. In fact their rates of lung cancer and most other cancers were slightly lower than nonsmokers, although the difference did not reach statistical significance.
Sidney, S. et al. Marijuana use and cancer incidence (California, United States). Cancer Causes and Control. Vol. 8 September 1997, p. 722-728.


2) OOPS, marijuana can prevent cancer (PART IV): Donald Tashkin, a researcher at UCLA, whose work is funded by NIDA, did a case-control study in which 1,200 patients with lung cancer, head and neck to a control group without cancer. Even heavier smokers marijuana had no increased risk of cancer, and had somewhat lower cancer risk than nonsmokers of snuff (smokers had a 20 times higher risk of lung cancer).
Tashkin D. Marijuana Use and Lung Cancer: Results of a case-control study. International Conference of the American Thoracic Society. May 23, 2006.


1) MEDICAL MARIJUANA HAS VALUE: In response to the approval of the medical marijuana law in California, the White House had the Institute of Medicine (IOM) review the data on the benefits and risks of medical marijuana. The IOM concluded, "Nausea, loss of appetite, pain and anxiety are all afflictions of mass loss, and all can be mitigated by marijuana." Noting the potential risks of smoking, the report acknowledges that there is no clear alternative for people suffering from chronic diseases that could be relieved by smoking marijuana, such as pain or AIDS wasting. The government's refusal to acknowledge this finding caused co-author John A. Benson to tell the New York Times that the government loves to ignore our report; they would rather it never happened.
. (joy, JE, Watson, SJ, and Benson, JA Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base National Academy Press, 1999. p 159. See also, Harris, G. FDA Dismisses medical benefits of marijuana .. .. New York Times. April 21, 2006)

SOURCE

Thanks for Reading Top 10 Cannabis Studies the Government Wished it Had Never Funded

Thank you for reading this Top 10 Cannabis Studies the Government Wished it Had Never Funded, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Top 10 Cannabis Studies the Government Wished it Had Never Funded Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2013/05/top-10-cannabis-studies-government.html