Chemotherapy That Costs $70,000 in the U.S. Costs $2,500 in India -Health & Beauty Informations. This article, entitled Chemotherapy That Costs $70,000 in the U.S. Costs $2,500 in India, we have prepared this article carefully for you so you can retrieve information therein. Hopefully you understand the contents of this article that we put under the category cancer, well, happy reading.

Title : Chemotherapy That Costs $70,000 in the U.S. Costs $2,500 in India
link : Chemotherapy That Costs $70,000 in the U.S. Costs $2,500 in India

Chemotherapy That Costs $70,000 in the U.S. Costs $2,500 in India

Gleevec, a drug used to treat leukemia, costs $ 70,000 to year in the US, but only $ 2,500 in India. This costly gap exists because of US patents that prevent competitors from making and selling lower-cost versions.

These patents do not exist to the same extent in India, and, in fact, just this month India's highest court again rejected a patent request of cancer drug -. a move that probably would have sent prices soaring

Government of India takes several steps for patents to prevent cancer drug

along with the rejection of patent applications, the Indian government has also granted (or plan to compulsory licensing) for at least five drugs targeting leukemia, breast, kidney and liver.


The licenses allow local companies of the drug to produce generic versions of drugs despite patents of their original manufacturers -. And without the need for authorization

Indonesia, China and the Philippines have adopted similar measures that allow them to circumvent the patents and give their populations have access to lower drug prices.

Such moves are likely to increase as cancer rates continue to rise and, with it, the demand for what is conventionally considered as the "best treatment".

is a firestorm in manufacturing, such as patents government applied protected allow pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for their drugs - a measure say it is needed to fund research and development necessary to produce drugs "to save lives".

But with more countries circumventing patents - and the simple fact that, as the Atlantic "US informed patients do not pay for an indefinite period increased 20 times in the price of medicines . paid by Indian consumers "- the faulty system is likely to be the source of growing tensions and, ultimately, is likely to crumble

the Atlantic continued (1):

"the fight for cancer drugs in India exposes a fundamental tension in the way we finance pharmaceutical R & D. the patents allow pharmaceutical companies that charge high prices for drugs during a limited period of time to regain his investment in R & D.

"This means more of the drugs we need, but it makes them less accessible to those who need them. The tension becomes greater in the global context, because income disparities among patients in developed and developing countries are so great. "

Cancer Drugs patented :? What we are really fighting on

pharmaceutical companies spend almost twice as much on marketing in the US as they do in R & D! This finding was published in the journal PLoS Medicine for five years in 2008. (2)

So tune that keep singing - they need drug patents and extravagant price tags on their medications to keep making new medicines. - is growing very tired

pharmaceutical companies use patents as it allows them to make more money. on average, Americans pay twice the price for identical drugs compared to other countries.

But the fight over patentability and drug prices is really just a distraction from the much larger issue at hand, which is the value of own ... or rather, the lack of the same drugs.

If you lived in 1900, is likely to have relied on treatments "cutting edge" of the time, they had you reassuring names like Golden Nugget Tablets and Magic nerving Dr. SAWEN pills Hollister, and promoted promises to cure all that ails you.

however, according to a new study that chemically analyzed dozens of patent medicines from the late 1800s and early 1900s, treatments contained not only beneficial ingredients like calcium and zinc, but also toxins such as lead, mercury and arsenic. (3)

study's principal investigator told Smithsonian magazine in an interview (4):

"Back in the day, this was a kind of trial and error very field. .. things that we consider dangerous now, even though it was dangerous, as was avant-garde, as they had at the time. "

Today, we look back and make fun of the therapies that our ancestors not so distant embraced, because we now know that the ingredients contained Many were toxic and could literally kill.

100 years from now, there will be many common prescription drugs as also Barbaric?

If we only had a window to the future, most likely would see what is already evident just before their eyes: that many of the treatments "cutting edge" of the 21st century are not Hollister better than gold nuggets of yesteryear.

The mercury and other toxic metals such as aluminum are still used in various vaccines, for example. even we allow mercury that is implanted directly into the mouth through fillings "silver"!

Other medications may not be much to talk about poisons such as mercury or lead, however, equally deadly consequences posed by other mechanisms.

Take Gleevec, a cancer drug that is at the root of the patent controversy, with patients competing to get their hands on this drug, "save lives."

Unfortunately, although it can help treat leukemia, but also kills the cells of the heart muscle, which can cause severe congestive heart failure.

So how can we laugh at people 100 years ago for taking deadly drugs ... when drugs today - and all the modern medical system - remain a main cause death This is perhaps more apparent than with drugs used to treat cancer ...

Many cancer patients die of Chemo

the National Confidential Information result in death of the patient and study (NCEPOD) found that more than four out of 10 patients who received chemotherapy at the end of life experienced potentially fatal effects.

And after reviewing data from more than 600 cancer patients who died within 30 days of receiving the treatment, it was found that chemotherapy hastened or caused death in 27 percent of cases .

Chemotherapy drugs are, by their very nature, extremely toxic and usually do not work with your body to modulate and normalize its response to let cancer usually resolves.

Despite its reputation as the gold standard in the treatment of cancer, chemotherapy has a success rate of survival at 5 years average of just over 2 percent for all cancers, according a study published in the journal Clinical Oncology. (5)

Meanwhile, a typical and potentially fatal side effects of chemotherapy is the destruction of cells rapid multiplication and division are in their

• bone marrow, which produces blood
• digestive Tract
• reproductive
• hair follicles

chemotherapy in actually it supports subpopulations of resistant malignant cells and tumors chemotherapy (eg, cancer stem cells), both the mildest killing cells and / or senescent cells within the tumor to remain slow, or even harmless growth.

As a result, this triggers a more aggressive, resistant type of cancer treatment to wreak havoc on the body.

Another major drawback to chemotherapy that destroys healthy cells throughout the body right along with cancer cells, a "side effect" that often leads to accelerated death, no cure.

Efficacy is a shot in the dark, in many cases, it is not entirely different from the popular "miracle cures" in the late 20th century

PREVENTION IS a better route than the treatment

the bottom line here is that there is much you can do to reduce the chances of getting cancer - you and your family can take control of your health.

Do not wait for the diagnosis and put his own life in the hope that offer outrageously expensive chemotherapy drugs ... take charge and be an active participant in your own health care, before ending the need disease management.

I think you can virtually eliminate the risk of cancer and other chronic diseases, and dramatically improve your chances of recovering from cancer if you currently have that, following these relatively simple risk reduction strategies.

1. Reducing or eliminating food intake, sugar / fructose carbohydrates and processed grains. This applies to organic unprocessed grains whole as well, as they tend to decompose rapidly and lead to their levels of insulin and leptin, which is the last thing you need to keep going if you're trying to solve or prevent cancer.
   
   
2. normalize their vitamin D status to get adequate sun exposure and supplementation consider carefully when this is not possible.
   
   However, if you are taking vitamin D orally, it is also necessary to make sure you are taking vitamin K2, as well as deficiency K2 is really what produces the symptoms of toxicity vitamin D, including inappropriate soft tissue calcification which can lead to hardening of the arteries.
   
   If you take vitamin D orally and has cancer, it would be prudent to monitor their levels of vitamin D in blood regularly.
   
   
3. consider reducing their levels of protein to one gram per kilogram of lean body weight. It would be unusual for most adults who need more than 100 grams of protein and probably about half of that.
   
   
4. Control your fasting insulin and leptin levels . This is the end result you get when sugars and grains from your diet takes off and start exercising regularly. Levels can be easily monitored with the use of simple analysis and relatively inexpensive blood.
   
   
5. normalize their relationship of omega-3, omega-6 by taking krill oil quality and reducing intake of most processed vegetable oils.
   
   
6. Exercise regularly. One of the main reasons why exercise works is that it drives your insulin levels down. Controlling insulin levels is one of the most effective ways to reduce your cancer risks.
   
   
7. The trick about exercise, however, is understanding how to use it as an accurate tool.
   
   This ensures you are getting enough to achieve the benefit, not enough to cause damage, and the right variety to balance your entire physical structure and maintain strength and flexibility, and aerobic fitness levels and anaerobic.
   
   If you have limited time exerts peak form are the best option, but ideally you should have a good strength training program as well.
   
   
8. How regularly good sleep .
   
   
9. reduce exposure to environmental toxins such as pesticides, chemicals, household cleaners, synthetic air fresheners and air pollution.
   
   
10. Limit exposure and provide protection from radiation itself produced by cell phones , towers, base and WiFi stations.
    
    
11. Avoid frying or Charbroiling their food. Boil, poach or steam your food instead.
    
    
12. have a tool to permanently reprogram the neurological short circuit that can activate cancer genes.
    
    
    is likely that this factor may be more important than the rest of the physical listed here, so make sure it is directed. My particular favorite tool to solve emotional problems, as you know, is Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) .
    
    
13. Eat at least one third of the raw food .
    
    
14. Consider adding cancer-fighting whole foods, herbs, spices and supplements to your diet, such as broccoli curcumin and resveratrol .

By Dr. Joseph Mercola

From the author: The existing medical establishment is responsible for killing and permanently injuring millions of Americans but the increasing number of visitors to Mercola.com since the site began in 1997 - are now routinely among the top 10 health sites on the Internet - convinces me that you, too, is tired of his deception. You want solutions health practices without the hype, and that's what I offer

References :.

• The Atlantic on April 10, 2013
• April Smithsonian.com 8, 2013
• Gizmodo April 8, 2013

1. on April 10 Atlantic, 2013
2. PLoS Medicine 5 (1): e1
3. study presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Atlanta, GA April 7, 2013
4. Smithsonian.com April 8, 2013
5. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2004 Dec; 16 (8) :. 549-60

Thanks for Reading Chemotherapy That Costs $70,000 in the U.S. Costs $2,500 in India

Thank you for reading this Chemotherapy That Costs $70,000 in the U.S. Costs $2,500 in India, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Chemotherapy That Costs $70,000 in the U.S. Costs $2,500 in India Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2016/07/chemotherapy-that-costs-70000-in-us.html