Title : AMA Urges Ban on Drug Ads
link : AMA Urges Ban on Drug Ads
AMA Urges Ban on Drug Ads
group of doctors that large pharmaceutical companies more concerned with profits than cure concerned.by James Spounias
It is ironic that in November 2015, the American Medical Association (AMA) urged ban on direct advertising to consumers for prescription drugs and implantable medical devices based on the ads contribute to rising costs and patient demand for inappropriate treatment.
The AMA said revenue from big pharma for advertising has increased by 30% in the past two years to $ 4.5 billion and that prices of pharmaceutical products up nearly 5% in 2015 .
the AMA said, "-directly consumer demand for new advertising also inflated and more expensive drugs, even when these drugs may not be appropriate. "
n essence, the AMA is saying the ads are working very well because the ads are bringing patients to the doctor, already pre-sold on the drug or treatment announced, whether or not they have the actual disease It is intended to treat.
Apparently daunting lists of side effects in ads that cause little or no concern for the patients pre-sold, especially when recipes of private insurance or government pay.
While on the surface it may seem WADA is doing something good, actually, this attempt to curb the greed of the big pharmaceutical companies may reflect the dilemma of having to serve two masters: Big Pharma and one government austerity itching.
Government and insurance companies can not sustain the payment of prescriptions priced astronomically and treatments forever.
The so-called health care in the United States costs a lot more their first world counterparts by the fact that the business model of medicine is more corporatist socialist now that Wall Street has his hands on benefits.
How it came to be that large pharmaceutical companies, the AMA and the medical profession are placed solidly as holders of monopoly in medicine
in what is a long history that has been Eustace Mullins told by injection murder :? the history of medical conspiracy against America , combined powerful interests to control the medical profession and the pharmaceutical industry, leading to what we have today :. corporate business model where high profits are obtained from misery and disease
in the 1800s, Homeopathy was popular in the United States. Created by Christian Friedrich Samuel Hahnemann and is based on the concept of cyrentur similibus (like cures like), homeopathy involved the use of natural components - non-toxic doses of substances that have energy similar to a condition that causes - in conjunction with the immune system.
Doctors had to spend a lot of time with patients, and the remedies were not terribly expensive, it is certainly not profitable.
Contrast that with allopathic medicine , where the surgery, pharmaceuticals and various other intensive treatments are used to "fix" a particular aspect of the person. The patient is more machine than human in allopathic medicine.
In an ideal world, in the opinion of this writer, both have their place in health and medicine, such as competition and sometimes complementary therapies.
However, over 100 years ago, medicine was decided for us by powerful families like the Rockefellers and Rothschild clans.
Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr. wrote in 1994
"The number of medical schools had increased from 90 in 1880 to 154 in 1903.The infamous" Flexner Report "in 1910 helped solidify the allopathic control of medicine.
"As an official history of AMA by James Gordon Burrow puts it, the" fearsome competition 'showed a need for "education reform," ie cartelization ... Joseph N. McCormack (secretary Board of Health of the State of Kentucky) spent a decade in agitation and propaganda among physicians in more than 2,000 cities and towns, inspiring speeches such as "danger to the public in a disorganized and poorly paid medical profession. "
" As specialists in medical ethics before and then denounced advertising (customers do know the services and prices in advance) and quackery (competition not approved). Join our union, he said, and that will raise your salary. In 1910, about 70,000 doctors belong to the AMA, an increase of eight times in the previous decade. "
Mullins points out interesting facts that are not in the accounts sanitized as the connection between the Flexner, Louis Brandeis and others whose fingerprints extended to geopolitics.
Mullins family claims happened on the curious connections of powerful interests in the medical complex and pharmacist during his stellar research at the Federal Reserve and politics world.
the Flexner Report was funded by Rockefeller project the aim of which was to eliminate competition and make the allopathic medicine only allowed therapy by the imposition of high productivity for medical school education
Mullins wrote :.
"Flexner program established requirements for four-year college student, and another four years of medical school.Competition, no "quackery" was condemned.
"His report also provides complex requirements for medical schools to medical education elitist and expensive way, and so removed, that most students would be prohibited from even considering race medicine.
"Towards the end of the First World War had reduced the number of medical schools to a mere 50. the annual number of graduates has been reduced from 7,500 to 2,500.
"The enactment of the Flexner restrictions virtually guaranteed that the medical monopoly in the United States would lead to a small group of elite students from well-off families, and that this small group to be subjected to intense controls" .
In 1906, the Pure Food and Drug Act was approved as part of the "progressive" reform.
The main changes occurred in 1938 and 1962, which are now responsible for a relationship revolving door between big pharma and Food Administration (FDA) Drug resulting in costs approval of drugs that hit $ 2.4 billion, according to the Tufts Center for the Study of drug Development .
Tufts said the cost was $ 800 million in 2001. If you wonder who could compete with that - or why someone would spend so much money for a natural substance "approved" - fully understands that high drug approval costs are met by the government and industry.
Given the side effects of large pharmaceutical companies, as described by the pharmaceutical executive turned whistleblower John Virapen, the real "science" behind popular drugs is incomplete.
In the book of Virapen Side Effects: Death - Confessions of a Pharma Insider , detailed corruption in the pharmaceutical industry - of payments range of how they are made diseases by the pharmaceutical and marketed specifically to improve sales and market shares industry.
medical profession and big pharmaceutical companies are born powerful interests that shaped public opinion and laws to conform to favor their own benefits. The idea that science and professionalism led us to what we have now is an absurdity.
No living person has experienced a truly free market in American medicine.
From license of medical professionals to FDA approval for drugs and procedures, all aspects of health and medicine is the result of hyper-regulation, virtually eliminating any meaningful choice about what therapies to use.
Many Americans pay twice -. For insurance "private" (which even before Obamacare still was regulated at the state level) and Medicare, a mandatory requirement for allopathic therapies program does not want
Ideally, we as free Americans, would be able to choose between different therapies - homeopathy, allopathic or whatever - competing against each other in an unfettered market .
Thanks for Reading AMA Urges Ban on Drug Ads
Thank you for reading this AMA Urges Ban on Drug Ads, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article AMA Urges Ban on Drug Ads Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2016/03/ama-urges-ban-on-drug-ads.html
0 Response to "AMA Urges Ban on Drug Ads"
Post a Comment