Title : Cancer Patients Live 4X Longer by Refusing Chemotherapy — 25 Years of Research
link : Cancer Patients Live 4X Longer by Refusing Chemotherapy — 25 Years of Research
Cancer Patients Live 4X Longer by Refusing Chemotherapy — 25 Years of Research
Yelena Sukhoterinachemotherapy is one of the most expensive in the world today medical treatments, but is it really effective ...?
Thanks to alternative media and documentaries such as " The truth about cancer 'series, more and more people begin to question not only effective, but also if actually does more harm than good
believe it or not that question may have been answered more than 40 years ago, when a shocking study was released that could have ended the chemo experiment -.. if anyone had been paying attention
Dr. Hardin B. Jones, a former professor of Medical Physics and Physiology at Berkeley, California, concluded after more than 25 years of research not only chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery do not work and not prolong the life of a cancer patient, but patients who receive this type of cancer treatment in many cases die much sooner than those who choose to be untreated.
Patients also die much more painful death .
"People chemotherapy refused live an average of 12 and a half years longer than people who are receiving chemotherapy," wrote Dr. Jones in the journal of the Academy Science New York.In 1969 he presented his research in Science Seminar writers of the American Cancer Society, and the incredible results still sent shock waves through the cancer industry to date.
Chemotherapy does not work the way it is supposed that
Because chemotherapy kill healthy cells before what affects cancer cells, the body is weakened and defenseless against the disease.
The addition of major side effects of toxins treatment on top, the human body is left barely clings to life without immune system to heal itself.
"It's not cancer that kills the victim. It is the breakdown of the defense mechanism that ultimately brings death," said Jones until midnight.He and his wife consider what they would do if they were to develop cancer and both agreed to stay away from conventional treatments and instead of doing everything possible to keep the body in the state as healthy as possible.
'Studies on treatment with vitamins
Jones Jones investigation showed great potential for nutritional treatment. Doctors A. Hoffer and Linus Pauling and analyzed reported Jones in multiple studies.
The results show that on average, patients with cancer who followed a regimen of vitamins and minerals was 4 times longer survival than patients who were not following the protocol. His conclusion was that all cancer patients need to start this protocol as soon as possible.
For people who wish to prevent cancer, would be beneficial also be in the same protocol only use lower doses.
The system includes: a daily dose of 12 g of vitamin C, vitamin B3, B6 and other B vitamins, folic acid, vitamin E, beta carotene, selenium, zinc, and sometimes other minerals (note: natural vitamins and minerals are almost always the best option, not all are created equal).
Other parts of the treatment were following a healthy diet, and care of mental health patients.
Jones Other findings on Cancer
in 1969 , the American Cancer Society published 'above presentation between 11 Jones and Science Writers Seminar. cancer biology was one of the main topics of research for Jones and the subject of this talk
"Cancer Report" delivered these conclusions by analyzing years of research :.
There is a strong link between carcinogens and cancer.
Jones said that the more the person was exposed to a carcinogen, the greater the risk of developing cancer.
Different carcinogenic substances have an effect and a slightly different schedule, but the stronger the individual dose of a carcinogen is not - the less time it takes for cancer to develop. With so many carcinogens in food today, air and water, it is no wonder why cancer rates increased.
Surgery and survival of radiation data is biased and erroneous
Jones provides multiple example of data errors when trying to compare the survival rates of patients who passed by surgery and / or radiotherapy versus those who were not treated. Most studies had seen no patients had died before completion of treatment.
Their deaths were omitted from the data as "rejected". By defining two groups as treated and untreated, the treated group had to have completed treatment in order to be counted in the study.
The study examined whether the patient survived after surgery or operation was over, and those who died during these two types of treatment does not "meet the criteria of" being in the "treated" group and they were omitted.
The longer the study was, and the more steps I had, the more errors were in the study, said Jones.
The full list of Jones works (written over a period of 41 years) is available online at the Bancroft Library in Berkeley, California.
has changed the effectiveness of chemotherapy?
If you've ever met a cancer survivor is known that there are plenty of them out there who have undergone chemotherapy and survived (of course, there seems to be more natural survivors who are not counted).
and the correct protocol nutritional, emotional, mental support, and other factors it is possible to live and heal the body after chemotherapy. That said, recent major studies have not exactly been in favor of chemotherapy.
Although some have defended the procedure because of recent "progress", the survival rate has remained questionable at best, if not dismal compared to natural and holistic treatments are performed in specialized and homes of people clinics.
According to a major study by the Department of Radiation Oncology at the Cancer Center of North Sydney and published in December 2004 issue of Clinical Oncology, the real impact of the chemotherapy on survival of American adults is a mere 2.1%, and that's only for a maximum of five years, not a "real survival rate."
with both risk and many Among the unpleasant side effects chemotherapy around, do you think it's worth the risk?
This article is for informational purposes only and should not constitute medical advice. It is not intended to treat, cure or prevent any disease. Talk to a doctor before making any major changes.
Thanks for Reading Cancer Patients Live 4X Longer by Refusing Chemotherapy — 25 Years of Research
Thank you for reading this Cancer Patients Live 4X Longer by Refusing Chemotherapy — 25 Years of Research, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Cancer Patients Live 4X Longer by Refusing Chemotherapy — 25 Years of Research Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2016/02/cancer-patients-live-4x-longer-by.html
0 Response to "Cancer Patients Live 4X Longer by Refusing Chemotherapy — 25 Years of Research"
Post a Comment