MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering & Weather Modification -Health & Beauty Informations. This article, entitled MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering & Weather Modification, we have prepared this article carefully for you so you can retrieve information therein. Hopefully you understand the contents of this article that we put under the category conspiracy, well, happy reading.

Title : MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering & Weather Modification
link : MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering & Weather Modification

MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering & Weather Modification

by Derrick Broze
ANTIMEDIA

As humanity working to prevent further environmental and ecological destruction to the planet, scientists continue to search for possible solutions to the many problems facing our species. One of these proposed solutions has been the science of geoengineering

According to a report of 2013 of Congress .

"The term 'geoengineering' describes this set of technologies that aim, through large-scale and deliberate changes of energy balance of the Earth, to reduce temperatures and counteract anthropogenic climate change. most of these technologies are in the conceptual stages and research and its effectiveness in reducing global temperature has been proven yet proven. on the other hand, very few studies have been published documenting the cost, environmental effects, socio-political impacts, and the legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were to be deployed, is expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary impacts.


in general, geoengineering technologies are classified as either method of removing carbon dioxide a (CDR) or a method of solar radiation management (SRM). CDR methods against the warming effects of greenhouse gases by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. CDR methods include ocean fertilization, and carbon capture and sequestration. SRM methods address climate change by increasing the reflectivity of the atmosphere or the surface of the Earth.

reflectors injection spray and space are based SRM Examples of methods. SRM methods do not eliminate greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, but can be implemented faster overall performance with relatively immediate cooling methods compared to CDR. "

Geoengineering is seen as a solution controversial, to say the least. That controversy is likely to deepen after a recent study by MIT's Center for Global Change Science and the Department of Earth, atmosphere and Planetary Sciences. the study, published in Scientific Reports of Nature found that geoengineering ocean fertilization could disrupt global precipitation patterns and affect water resources.

ocean fertilization is a type of geoengineering that seeks to mimic the ability of phytoplankton, microalgae on the basis of the most ocean food webs, photosynthesis sunlight. as phytoplankton absorb carbon dioxide, which also release dimethyl sulphide (DMS) in the atmosphere, which can form sulfate aerosols and reflect sunlight and cool the climate. geoengineers hope to reproduce this natural process and therefore reflect sunlight and cool the Earth.

according to Phys.org , the researchers used one of the global climate models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which simulates the evolution of interactions between the ocean masses , atmosphere and land. These simulations found that increased emissions of DMS actually lead to an increase of 1.2 degrees Celsius by 2100 and "substantial reduction in rainfall in some regions."

Chien Wang, a co author of the study and senior research scientist at MIT's Center for Global Change Science and the Department of Earth, said the study was "the first in-depth analysis of ocean fertilization that has been highlighted the potential danger of adversely affect precipitation. "

Benjamin Grandey, a post-doctoral senior in the group of Wang who set the model simulations and analyzed the data, said that although "Overall, our results suggest that the cooling effect associated with improved DMS offset warming emissions worldwide, especially in the Arctic, "but would also lead to dangerous changes in the global climate. "The precipitation would also be reduced worldwide, and some parts of the world would be worse. Europe, the Horn of Africa and Pakistan may receive less rainfall than have historically," Grandey said.

Rainfall lower could significantly reduce water resources and endanger the environment and the livelihoods of animals and people in the affected regions.

the MIT team is not the first to ring the bells alarm when it comes to other forms of geoengineering and weather modification. Although various authorities have warned about the dangers of geo-engineering techniques, risks are seen as secondary to the possible effects of climate change. The interesting thing to note is that, although proponents of geoengineering hailed as the solution to climate change and the maintenance of life, studies show that geoengineering could actually have the opposite effect of global warming.

in February 2015, an international committee of scientists published a report stating that geoengineering techniques are not a viable option for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases to combat the effects of climate change alternative. The committee's report called for more research and understanding of the various geoengineering techniques, including systems for removal of carbon dioxide and management of solar radiation before implementation.

Scientists discovered that Solar management radiation, or albedo modification techniques are likely to have "serious known and unknown risks potential environmental, social, and political, including the possibility of being deployed unilaterally." The report was sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, the United States Intelligence Community, NASA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Department of Energy of the United States.

Another danger of weather manipulation is the loss of blue skies. According to a report New Scientist , Ben Kravitz of the Carnegie Institution for Science has shown that the release of sulfate aerosols in the upper atmosphere scatter sunlight in the atmosphere. He says this could reduce the amount of sunlight that reaches the ground by 20% and make the sky seem more nebulous.

According to a 2013 study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, if geoengineering programs were started and then stopped suddenly, the planet could see an immediate increase in temperatures, especially in the land. The study, titled "The impact of the abrupt suspension of operation of solar radiation," suggests that once you start geoengineering, you can not suspend the programs without causing the same problem they were trying to resolve.

what are the solutions to the many ecological and environmental problems facing humanity? Studies indicate that the attempt to play God with time will have disastrous effects on the ability of the human population to live and prosper. If you are afraid of the results of mad scientists who control the weather or the search for dangerous solutions such as geoengineering, please share this article and continue to spread the knowledge. It is time that people wake up from this Earth who unite against those who seek to destroy the planet -. And look for solutions that work with Earth rather than trying to dominate and exploit

"MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering & Weather Modification", article source: riseearth.com

Thanks for Reading MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering & Weather Modification

Thank you for reading this MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering & Weather Modification, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering & Weather Modification Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2015/09/mit-study-warns-about-dangers-of.html