The Giza Pyramids – Unravelling the Mystery -Health & Beauty Informations. This article, entitled The Giza Pyramids – Unravelling the Mystery, we have prepared this article carefully for you so you can retrieve information therein. Hopefully you understand the contents of this article that we put under the category knowledge, well, happy reading.

Title : The Giza Pyramids – Unravelling the Mystery
link : The Giza Pyramids – Unravelling the Mystery

The Giza Pyramids – Unravelling the Mystery

by Robert Carson GrahamHancock.com
Waking Times

Throughout my life (I have sixty-five) have produced many theories as to how they had built the pyramids of Giza. Most of these theories have been offered by Egyptologists, but others outside archeology have also theorized about how they were built. One of the most inspiring and intriguing theories of recent times was presented by Jean-Pierre Houdin some years ago. He argued that a spiral ramp had been created within the Great Pyramid during construction to transport limestone blocks to the upper levels of the structure. Had reached this conclusion after realizing that most of the construction materials had to have in the structure at a fairly low level, before being transported to the highest levels.

This was a logical conclusion, since the ancient pyramid builders had no means of installation of the stones of the outer cover in the staggered levels after the core of the structure had been built. In fact, it was absolutely imperative that blocks cable sheath are installed in each course of the first structure - before the main rectangular blocks were installed behind them - for this was the only way to accurately study the structure and make sure your pyramid shape was maintained throughout the construction process. An architect by profession, Jean-Pierre Houdin was well aware of the need to accurately examine a structure at all stages of its construction.


theories about the construction of the pyramids and their range purpose of naive to the ridiculous weakly, with more reasoned theories, such as that mentioned above, somewhere in the middle .
presumably, therefore, that most theories emanating from the archaeological profession would be somewhere in the middle too, but that's not the case. Some of the most naive theories have come from Egyptologists and indeed, have had to back-peddle on a number of occasions when new information has come to light - or when plain common sense prevailed. However, I do not want to draw Egyptologists for criticism because they were in a more difficult position. Both the public and the media looked Egyptologists to provide answers to a variety of issues related to the pyramids of Giza, however, in many cases Egyptologists had no answers to these questions. The big problem for Egyptologists and other professionals is that they can only say that they have the answer very occasionally, as if a specialist says he does not know the answer to a question too often people start to doubt their ability to do their job - and that's the last thing anyone would want professional bring upon themselves. So while the public believed it was the responsibility of the Egyptological profession to provide them with answers to Egyptologists expected to reach the answers to these questions.

There is a paradox here, however, for the same people who have been subjected to more pressure to provide answers to all our questions regarding the construction of the Great Pyramid and its companions - Egyptologists - are probably the last people we should do the questions. After all, since when archaeologists become experts in building and construction and civil engineering? This was not what they were trained to do. So it is not surprising that so show little understanding of complex structures such as the pyramids of Giza? Of course, Egyptologists must take some blame for being this situation get out of hand, so that should be brought to the attention of the media a long time that this was not his specialty ago - and should have consulted with other specialists in this at least. I personally think they should have gone much further, however, and establish a multidisciplinary working group to examine the consequences of the construction of the pyramids of Giza. If they had recognized the need to do so, probably could have avoided many of the criticisms leveled at them at the end of the last century and the first decade of the century.

Egyptologists had come to believe that the pyramids Giza were built as mausoleums of three successive rulers of the Old Kingdom; Therefore, they reasoned that the chambers and passageways within these structures must have been created with this purpose in mind. They seemed indifferent that many of these internal spaces seemed inadequate for the purpose. But this was all conjecture on your part, and is based more on their belief system in a comprehensive analysis of the physical evidence that was available. However, the media and the public expects them to know the purpose of these cameras, so why have questioned what Egyptologists had to say on the subject. After all, these were the experts in ancient Egypt

I think his problems started with the discovery -. And subsequent reporting in the Western media - a basalt sarcophagus found in the camera mortuary well below the foundations of the smallest of the three major pyramids of Giza long time. This sarcophagus was discovered during excavations in the small pyramid English army officer, Colonel Howard Vyse in 1837. The sarcophagus was decorated in what is known as the "style palace facade", but no hieroglyphics on the sarcophagus. His cover was lost, but some fragments of the lid is in the camera. (This sarcophagus would have been a museum piece first had today did not succumb to misfortune on his trip to the British Museum. The ship transporting the sarcophagus to England sank to the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea somewhere between Malta and Spain, when found bad weather.)

I think many misconceptions about the great pyramid arising from the exploration of the small pyramid of Giza Vyse, as it was here where it was discovered that three slabs "rake" they had been lowered into one of the passages that blocked the entrance to the ducts and chambers beyond. In a chamber at the end of this passage it was also found that a huge limestone block had slid down a ramp to block the entrance of a passageway in a lower level, where the burial chamber was. Therefore, this pyramid contained all the elements that later contributed to the great confusion of spirits with respect to the chambers and passages in these structures, especially with regard to the Great Pyramid.

The most smallest of the three great pyramids of Giza contained - among other passages and chambers - a burial chamber, rake / slabs of stone blocks and a block, it was not logical, therefore, to assume that similar characteristics in the great Pyramid also served the same purpose ? I think this was the fundamental mistake made by Egyptologists that led to his later theories about the Great Pyramid being increasingly questioned, for the orthodox position in these structures simply do not withstand scrutiny.

The smallest of the three major pyramids of Giza it does not contain a death chamber - for all we know - the burial chamber mentioned above was discovered far below the level of the foundations of the small pyramid at the lowest underground level - it was not within the pyramid itself. A chest granite was discovered in the upper chamber (King's Chamber) of the Great Pyramid, so it was assumed that this had been a burial chamber also camera. But where are the parallels were here? The chest is in the upper chamber of the Great Pyramid was a simple box without decoration or inscriptions at all. Was it really a sarcophagus? The other big question, of course, is why the builders of the Great Pyramid create a funeral fifty meters or more camera above the ground, when they could put fifty meters below ground level and then put a huge pyramid the top of it? After all, Egyptologists tell us that the pyramids evolved from the early mastabas stepped pyramids and later, in which the ancient Egyptians buried their dead underground beneath these structures. Why then change the habits that had probably suffered for many generations and between the body of a king in a chamber inside the Great Pyramid? Had they not shown that the smallest of the three major pyramids of Giza had continued the practice of placing the burial chamber well below ground level, as they had done with these earlier structures?

rake slabs are another feature of the small pyramid that archaeologists should have ignored until better understand their function. However, that was not to be, and what happened to muddy the waters even more when they reached the conclusion that the rake slabs had also been installed in the "waiting room" of the Great Pyramid. There can not be a comparison of the cameras here, to the portcullis slabs were simply installed in three pairs of cut into the side walls of a horizontal passage in the little pyramid, a passage that was underground slots, not the pyramid itself. The three pairs of empty slots (there is a granite counter in a fourth pair of vertical slots) in the Great Pyramid are cut into the side walls of granite called antechamber. It is also easy to see that this little camera was extensively damaged at some point in the past, unlike the little pyramid, although there is no rake slabs fragments were discovered in the inner chambers and corridors of the Great Pyramid. (As a matter of interest, the walls of the large gallery in the Great Pyramid have also suffered considerable damage.) The idea that immediately comes to mind when you first learn of these facts is that perhaps these interior spaces - chambers, shafts and passages in the Great Pyramid - served some other purpose ... or is it just the engineer in me talking? Either way, surely archaeologists should have realized that something else may have been going here -. That these chambers and passages may have been created for another purpose

There is also another very important factor that I think they should Egyptologists have been concerned about these theories when it aired for the first time. All chambers and passages mentioned above and discovered at the site of the small pyramid are below ground level - they are all underground. Why then should these chambers and passages have been compared to those within the Great Pyramid? In my opinion, it is a path that Egyptologists should never have ventured. But gradually this was the road down which they traveled, and eventually became untenable theories. However, this lack of consideration of the largest and think things image also had other implications as it meant that the establishment of Egyptological had to spend a lot of time and energy in defense of their erroneous theories - time that could have It has been put to better use in an effort to discover the true purpose of these interior spaces. That, in my opinion, is why it was not made any real progress in this area during the course of my life ... and now. Egyptologists were distracted and eventually lost their way on this issue. They never seemed to accept that maybe it was his theories that were wrong and that perhaps a complete rethinking requested. Egyptologists never came close to discovering how they had built the pyramids of Giza as no one was looking at the internal distribution of chambers and passages in the Great Pyramid and trying to figure out their true purpose. That left others to do.

Looking back at how little progress has been made in the last century on this topic, however, should now come as a big surprise for Egyptologists to learn now almost all clues about how the great pyramid was built to hide themselves in sight for decades. Physical evidence that I discovered over a period of ten years - after discovering the key to how they had built these structures - becomes literally almost everything we thought we understood about these structures - and the people who they built - in her head. Egyptologists failed to detect all these physical tracks for the simple reason that they thought they had it all planned. Unfortunately - Egyptology - who had done the most fundamental mistake of all, believed that their theories to be infallible despite the fact that they were unproven

The unpleasant truth (by Egyptologists) is that it is not. House No. King, or Queen's Chamber antechamber found in the great pyramid in the XXI century, by now we know the real purpose of all of their cameras and so-called "corridors". Jean-Pierre Houdin was indeed correct when he concluded that the overwhelming majority of masonry used in the construction of the Great Pyramid was taken in the structure at a low level before being transported through the structure to their final destination. What Jean-Pierre did not discover, however, it was that the chambers, passageways and shafts within the structure were the internal infrastructure needed to transport all supplies (which was not an internal spiral ramp, as Jean- Pierre had assumed). What Egyptologists and most of us had come to understand for so long was that these massive structures could only be built from the inside. If we had done the previous key apprehended, the internal features of the Great Pyramid and his colleagues may have made more sense for us long ago. So, we had to wait until the twenty-first century to the Great Pyramid to give up its secrets.

About the author

Robert Carson is a retired engineer one lifelong interest in ancient structures. He is the author of The Great Pyramid - The Inside Story , a book he describes as an A to Z of the construction of the pyramid based on the physical evidence can be found in the pyramids of Giza

"The Giza Pyramids – Unravelling the Mystery", article source: riseearth.com

Thanks for Reading The Giza Pyramids – Unravelling the Mystery

Thank you for reading this The Giza Pyramids – Unravelling the Mystery, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article The Giza Pyramids – Unravelling the Mystery Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2014/10/the-giza-pyramids-unravelling-mystery.html