Title : 18 Scientifically Validated Reasons to End Public Water Fluoridation
link : 18 Scientifically Validated Reasons to End Public Water Fluoridation
18 Scientifically Validated Reasons to End Public Water Fluoridation
Anna HuntActivist Post
Many people are realizing that, far from improving dental health, fluoridation of municipal water and many foods and beverages store bought is actually detrimental to our overall health. What was once a widely accepted practice is now being investigated and condemned by many prominent physicians and freethinkers , and scientific evidence to support these sentences is increasing.
Recently, a doctor Harvard study said that ingestion fluoride leads to a loss of IQ in young children, which is very alarming in itself.
Now, another study has been published, taking a deep look at the pros and cons of fluoride ingestion . Conducted by Stephen Peckham and Niyi Awofeso, and published in The World Scientific Journal, this new research begins with the following important introduction, which calls for an end to fluoridation of public water:
fluorine is the 13th most abundant element in the world and constitutes 0.08% of the earth's crust. It has the highest electronegativity of all elements. Fluoride is widely distributed in the environment, occurring in air, soil, rocks and water. Although fluoride is used industrially in a fluorine compound, the manufacture of ceramics, pesticides, aerosol propellants, refrigerants, glassware and utensils Teflon, which is a byproduct generally not desired aluminum, fertilizers, and ore production iron. The medicinal use of fluorides for prevention of dental caries began in January 1945, when the water supply of the community in Grand Rapids, United States, fluoridated at a level of 1 ppm as a measure to prevent tooth decay . However, water fluoridation remains a public health measure controversial. This paper analyzes the effects on human health of fluoride. The authors conclude that available evidence suggests that fluoride has the potential to cause major adverse human health problems, while only a modest effect of preventing tooth decay. As part of efforts to reduce the intake of harmful fluoride, the practice of artificial water fluoridation should be reconsidered worldwide, while must be tightened in order to reduce unethical discharge of fluoride compounds the environment of industrial safety. approaches to global public health to reduce tooth decay that do not involve the ingestion of systemic fluoride are urgently needed. Without mincing words, this new study moves to the right in support of these claims, which offers the following indications that fluoride is not only dubious benefit to dental health, but also terrible for human health in general:
1. fluoride is not critical to healthy teeth
it is widely accepted that fluoride only helps prevent tooth decay by topical means through direct action on the tooth enamel predominately after eruption and plaque [ 16 17 ]. However, it is important to note that while fluoride contributes to the remineralization of the enamel on the tooth surface that does not depend fluoride and anticaries effect of fluoride is critically dependent on calcium and magnesium enamel of the teeth.2. Fluoride can actually make some people more vulnerable to dental caries
Among young individuals with low level of calcium and magnesium in tooth enamel (usually due to malnutrition), fluoride ingestion and contact with the teeth present histologically as hypo- calcification and / or hypoplasia, which can, paradoxically, make those people are more vulnerable to tooth decay [ 18 19 ].3. Due to the complex nature of how to develop caries, is too difficult to say whether water fluoridation actually helps prevent tooth decay:
... multiple pathways for the development of dental caries make it difficult to accurately determine the contribution of fluoride ingestion prevention of dental caries. Given that the action of fluoride in the prevention of tooth decay is topical fluoride, topical products are only likely to provide optimal benefits claimed for this chemical.4. The history of research on fluoride intake as an effective means of preventing dental caries is controversial, at best:
a survey of 55 specialists in oral health reputable on the impacts of fluoridation artificial water and other prevention technologies in reducing the prevalence of dental caries in the last four decades in most nations revealed that, in addition to fluoride toothpaste, there were conflicting answers about the impact of other technologies based on artificial fluoride and water fluoridation [32] . The studies focused on dental caries trends following cessation of fluoridation have yielded conflicting results, due in part to study the art, availability of other sources of fluoride, and patterns of consumption of cariogenic foods [ 33 34 ].
5. Fluoride is classified as a pollutant and there is no such thing as a disease caused by deficiency . fluoride
6. fluoride in public drinking water makes it impossible to administer an adequate dose causing an increase in toxic fluorosis dental
One of the main concerns about water fluoridation is the inability to control the dose of fluoride ingested an individual puts into question the concept of "optimal dose". Since the 1980s, numerous studies have found that adults and children outgrow these agreed limits, contributing to a rapid increase in dental fluorosis, the first sign of fluoride toxicity [ 35 - 37 ].7. mass contamination of drinking water with fluoride is toxic to children:
In 1991, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) US They measured fluoride levels and found that when fluoridated water is between 0.7 and 1.2 ppm of fluoride generally the total intake of adults was 1.58 to 6.6 mg per day, while for children was between 0.9 and 3.6 mg per day and had at least a variation of six times simply by drinking water alone [ 38 ].The inability to control individual dose makes the notion of an obsolete "optimal concentration". In the US, a study in Iowa found that 90% of the 3 months of age who consume above their recommended upper limits, with some infants ingest more than 6 mg of fluoride daily, above what the Agency and the Environmental Protection wHO say it is safe to avoid crippling skeletal fluorosis [ 41 ].
8. fluoride can increase the risk of tooth decay for malnourished children:
fluoride exposure has a complex relationship in relation to dental caries and may increase the risk of dental caries in malnourished children due to reduced calcium and hypoplasia . enamel, while offering modest preventing tooth decay in children otherwise well nourished
9. effects of water fluoridation cognitive development children:
in a meta-analysis of 27 studies, mostly based in China fluoride and neurotoxicity, researchers from the School of Public Health and the China Medical University in Shenyang Harvard found strong evidence that fluoride can adversely affect cognitive development in children [ 50 ].10. Water fluoridation can cause hypothyroidism in children:
In a 2005 study, it was found that 47% of children living in a suburb of New Delhi with an average level of fluoride in water of 4.37 ppm have evidence of clinical hypothyroidism attributable to fluoride.11. fluoride intake actually can cause bone disease
In some cases where fluorine-levels are too high or when there prolonged intake to 2 ppm or more have been reported cases of skeletal fluorosis. skeletal fluorosis is a chronic metabolic bone disease caused by ingestion or inhalation of large amounts of fluoride.12. As an enzyme disruptor, fluoride interferes with normal functioning of the body of many complex ways:
Fluoride is a known enzyme disruptor. For example, the anticaries effect of fluoride is derived in part from its ability to disrupt enzymes cariogenic bacteria [ 20 21 ]. Fluoride can interfere joining metal ions located in the active site of an enzyme or by forming hydrogen bonds competing in the active site that is not limited only in the teeth [ 64 ]. There are 66 enzymes that are affected by the ingestion of fluoride, including P450 oxidases and the enzyme that facilitates the formation of flexible enamel [ 65 ].13. "chronic ingestion of fluoride is commonly associated with hyperkalemia and subsequent ventricular fibrillation [ 70 ]."
14. fluoride ingestion has been linked to cancer , but has not yet been shown that direct cause of this disease
has also been a number of studies linking fluoride and cancer . Over 50 population-based studies have examined the possible link between fluoride levels in water and cancer have been reported in the medical literature. Most of these studies have found a strong relationship between chronic ingestion of fluoride and cancer.15. ethical point of view, water fluoridation is mass medicine without the consent
However, population-based studies strongly suggest that chronic ingestion of fluoride is a possible cause of uterus and bladder cancer; there may be a link with osteosarcoma-out as an area where there is evidence of problems that require further investigation [ 30 72 - 74 ].
... Water fluoridation community gives governments important questions about medication without consent, the removal of individual choice and if public water supplies are a mechanism appropriate delivery [ 75 76 ].16. The human body does not need fluoride to be healthy:
One of the first controversies following the completion of the post-1945 Grand Rapids judgment of water fluoridation it was as fluoride ingested by humans should be classified, a nutrient, drug or pollutant. Despite numerous studies, the essentiality of fluoride as a trace element or nutrient has not been tested and is now widely accepted that fluoride is not essential to human physiology element [ 30 78 ].17. Although promoted as a medicine for tooth decay, fluoride is not regulated or controlled as a medicine:
in an extensive review of fluoride and human health published in 2011, the Scientific Committee of the European Commission on health and environmental risks concluded that fluoride is not essential for growth and human development [ 30 ].
Although fluoride, which is used in artificial fluoridation water is promoted as a drug for the prevention of tooth decay, which is not subject to the strict rules of drug laws in the countries that implement artificial water fluoridation. The practice of water fluoridation is recommended as a means of preventing tooth decay. Despite this very clear definition of purpose, no country defines fluoridation fluoridation of the water supply as a medicine.18. There best alternatives for preventing caries fluoridation:
The polarized debate on the role of fluoride ingested in dental health ignores the basic problem that tooth decay is essentially the result of bacterial infection of tooth enamel. While it may have been excusable in the 1950s to use an enzyme poison such as fluoride undesirably alter dental architecture and kill cariogenic bacteria, a better understanding of the pathogenesis of dental caries, along with the development of antibiotics and probiotics with strong anticariogenic effects, decreases important for the future of fluoride in caries prevention role.Conclusion
fluoridation of community water is not really world standard:
Currently, only about 5% of the population of 350 million people in the world (including 200 million US) artificially fluoridated water consumed worldwide. Only eight countries: Malaysia, Australia, USA, New Zealand, Singapore, and Ireland, over 50% of artificially fluoridate water supply. Over the past two decades many communities in Canada, USA, Australia and New Zealand have stopped fluoridation of their water supplies in Israel and the Minister of Health announced in April 2013 at the end of compulsory water fluoridation.Fluoride has become so controversial in the United States that many citizens formed groups are actively and effectively asking local governments to stop the community municipal water fluoridation. Couple this with the fact that many manufacturers are giving consumer choices to avoid fluoride commonly used products, such as toothpaste and mouthwash .
If the city government has not yet seen the light and eliminated this poison, do yourself and your family a favor and switch to using filtered water at home. Berkey makes an excellent filter when par with fluoride units , makes it easy to avoid fluoridated drinking and cooking water. You can also get a shower head filter which prevents the absorption of fluoridated water through the skin after each bath.
Science is, fluoride is dangerous to your health . Please be advised, and share this news with your friends and family
Sources:.
- Stephen Peckham and Niyi Awofeso, "Water fluoridation: A critical review of the physiological effects of ingested fluoride as a public health intervention, "the Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 293019, 10 pages, 2014. doi: 10.1155 / 2014/293019 - http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/293019/
- http://www.wakingtimes.com/2014/02/13/fluoride-killing-childs-brain-softly/
"18 Scientifically Validated Reasons to End Public Water Fluoridation", article source: riseearth.com
Thanks for Reading 18 Scientifically Validated Reasons to End Public Water Fluoridation
Thank you for reading this 18 Scientifically Validated Reasons to End Public Water Fluoridation, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article 18 Scientifically Validated Reasons to End Public Water Fluoridation Url Address https://healthnbeautyarticles.blogspot.com/2014/04/18-scientifically-validated-reasons-to.html
0 Response to "18 Scientifically Validated Reasons to End Public Water Fluoridation"
Post a Comment